I think it's time... pt. 2

[AKQJ10]

[ QUOTE ]
Doing the opposite, however, by ignoring hand review and focusing on stats (with an insufficient number of hands in database), would (at best) be little value-added, or (at worst) lead you down the wrong path.

[/ QUOTE ]

From this forum (or probably others on the site too), I get the distinct impression that people are overrelying on the stats.

[Holden97]

[ QUOTE ]
PAHUD can also be a crutch since you can see mucked cards

[/ QUOTE ]

What sites does PAHUD work on? So much for never showing cards to avoid telling opponents anything.

[Holden97]

[ QUOTE ]
What sites does PAHUD work on?

[/ QUOTE ]

OK, disregard that question (and please don't flame me). I remembered that search engine called google and found this web page .

Thanks

[Benoit]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Doing the opposite, however, by ignoring hand review and focusing on stats (with an insufficient number of hands in database), would (at best) be little value-added, or (at worst) lead you down the wrong path.

[/ QUOTE ]

From this forum (or probably others on the site too), I get the distinct impression that people are overrelying on the stats.

[/ QUOTE ]

Yeah I agree, at least for my own use I would rather just see a persons hole cards and recall how they played the hand. I can learn a whole lot more from 1 or 2 of these hands then by pokertracker rating the player for me.

Instead I've been using pokertracker for s--ts & giggles, and to look back and realize how much I really don't know. I admit it's good to keep me grounded when it comes to fooling myself on how good I really am.

You can open your hand history and see the player who has called your river bet's hole cards.

[cardcounter0]

With those stats, I would move up to .25/.50 or even .50/1.00 and at least see a little bit of money for your effort.

Go to the microlimit forums. Read, read, read, and maybe post a hand or two.