Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > PL/NL Texas Hold'em > Mid-, High-Stakes Pot- and No-Limit Hold'em
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 04-25-2005, 02:01 PM
Marginilizer Marginilizer is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 19
Default Re: 5/5 NL at foxwoods, big bluff on river

Meant to write QQ on that last post. Still think he's getting called by Jack high flush or better.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 04-25-2005, 02:12 PM
Chr Chr is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Denmark
Posts: 49
Default Re: 5/5 NL at foxwoods, big bluff on river

I really like your riverplay.

The play of the hand could very easy be QQ, 55 or 44 in your hand.

The tiny bet from villain on the river looks like he didn't really like the board paired. He's making a valuebet with an oppertunity to fold. If he also remembers you always win at showdown, he will hate this all-in. I think there's a good chance he will fold a small flush.

btw, I don't like your pf call.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 04-25-2005, 02:14 PM
FoxwoodsFiend FoxwoodsFiend is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: New Haven
Posts: 248
Default Re: 5/5 NL at foxwoods, big bluff on river

[ QUOTE ]
I have never actually witnessed him make a giant laydown.


[/ QUOTE ]
You're giving this guy almost 3:1 on a call and you think he's going to fold because the board paired? What's he been putting you on-middle pair? I also doubt you play a set this way, so he probably wouldn't even lay down AK. Obviously these situations are read-dependend, but based on the fact he has never made a laydown in front of you, I would only make this bet if I thought he could play KJ or K10 like this and view it as a value bet.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 04-25-2005, 02:18 PM
turnipmonster turnipmonster is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 511
Default general question

how does villian's river bet size factor into whatever folding equity we have? in other words, would we rather he checked, bet 300, or bet more (clearly the worst time to attempt a bluff)?

my opinion is that if we were forced to pick a time to bluff out of those 3 scenarios, I would rather he bet 300 than checked or bet more.

--turnipmonster
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 04-25-2005, 02:28 PM
Chr Chr is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Denmark
Posts: 49
Default Re: general question

Agreed. A check would often be designed for check-call and a bigger bet will make it impossible to kick him off.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 04-25-2005, 02:30 PM
Chaostracize Chaostracize is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 160
Default Re: general question

I completely agree which is precisely the reason that I think bluffing here with these stacks is terrible.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 04-25-2005, 02:35 PM
LuvDemNutz LuvDemNutz is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 13
Default Re: general question

[ QUOTE ]
I completely agree which is precisely the reason that I think bluffing here with these stacks is terrible.

[/ QUOTE ]

I'm not sure why you agree, as it seems that out of the 3 scenarios presented, this would be the best time to attempt a bluff.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 04-25-2005, 02:39 PM
Chaostracize Chaostracize is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 160
Default Re: general question

Ok. My point is that since this would be the BEST time bluff, and since even that is a bad time to bluff, that bluffing should be discarded as an option by the end of the hand. Does that make more sense?

EDIT: Eh... I mean that if bluffing is your only option, this is how you'd want it to go down. But bluffing here is still a bad play.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 04-25-2005, 02:45 PM
thabadguy thabadguy is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Make Way for the Bad Guy...
Posts: 771
Default Re: general question

I luv the bluff here, i think the small river bet is a small flush, capable of folding and if you have only shown down "monstahs" then he is folding.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 04-25-2005, 02:48 PM
Chaostracize Chaostracize is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 160
Default Re: general question

Did you read my other post explaining why I think this river bluff is bad?
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:35 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.