Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > PL/NL Texas Hold'em > Mid-, High-Stakes Pot- and No-Limit Hold'em
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 11-16-2005, 05:25 PM
SunOfBeach SunOfBeach is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 5
Default Re: Party 10/20NL, missed OES&Flush draw OOP on river, correct bluff size?

id go with about 800 here.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 11-16-2005, 05:34 PM
TheWorstPlayer TheWorstPlayer is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Boring work = post too much
Posts: 2,435
Default Re: Party 10/20NL, missed OES&Flush draw OOP on river, correct bluff size?

So basically if he min-raises you are planning on pushing and hoping he folds. I haven't noticed people who call flop, min-raise turn to be folding the turn too often. I think if you want fequity, c/r turn is better line. Or just bet a tiny bit more on turn and push river.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 11-16-2005, 05:43 PM
howzit howzit is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 99
Default Re: Party 10/20NL, missed OES&Flush draw OOP on river, correct bluff size?

[ QUOTE ]
What about check turn, take the freebie if he checks behind, c/r all in if he bets?

[/ QUOTE ]

i used to do this until people realized i would be betting the turn more often then checking w/a flopped monster.

To flip that, I think doing this w/a made hand would get QQ-AA to call high % of the time as this straight+flush board is somewhat unintimidating; much less than something like T-8-6-K board.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 11-16-2005, 05:51 PM
lapoker17 lapoker17 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 183
Default Re: Party 10/20NL, missed OES&Flush draw OOP on river, correct bluff size?

That's why I mentioned it - Or the reverse is why I mentioned it - I will often lead the flop and check the turn with a monster in a spot like this. I like it. Overpairs will often assume you are leading w 88 and that you have given up on the turn - they will bet it for you a lot of the time.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 11-16-2005, 07:07 PM
okayplayer okayplayer is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 167
Default Re: Party 10/20NL, missed OES&Flush draw OOP on river, correct bluff s

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
All in.

[/ QUOTE ]
You don't think half pot on turn, overbet pot on river might strike someone as fishy? If you're going to take this line, I think you should make a bigger bet on the turn so that it is believable that you have a made hand and are worried about protecting against draws. And then the river push will be pot-sized instead of over pot-sized.

[/ QUOTE ]

Well, I don't like Hero's turn play, but a push here, is only slightly more than pot (~10% more). I would do this with a made hand here, so that's why I would also do it with 7high. But for me this play is very player dependent. Some people (and it seems like Villain could be one of them) will call down this board, with the line, "call a reasonable river bet", and a push really puts him to the test, as it is not that reasonable. But some will call down all the way regardless, saying I have a big pair he might be bluffing, so that is why I don't do this w/o a good read.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 11-16-2005, 07:50 PM
matt holland matt holland is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 3
Default Re: Party 10/20NL, missed OES&Flush draw OOP on river, correct bluff s

[ QUOTE ]
I will often lead the flop and check the turn with a monster in a spot like this. I like it. Overpairs will often assume you are leading w 88 and that you have given up on the turn - they will bet it for you a lot of the time.

[/ QUOTE ]

When they bet it for you are you almost always going to put in the big check-raise right there on the turn?
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 11-17-2005, 02:47 PM
IHateCats IHateCats is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 68
Default RESULTS

I bet $750 and after a horribly long pause UTG+1 that made me feel ill he folded. In retrospect, I think 900-1k here looks more like a FH trying extract max value, I think the $750 was a touch weak.

Thanks to all those that posted, I do understand that I have a # of options on the turn, more so than usual with this particular hand since it's such a powerful draw. With fewer outs and fewer potential bluff outs or against a known more aggressive opponent, I definitely do not weak lead here, it's either CR or bet close to the pot.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:00 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.