#1
|
|||
|
|||
Styles of play at various sites?
I just logged into Pacific poker for the first time in 6 months and I noticed this weak loose/tight style permeates all of their games above the micros. I didn't see a hand brought in for a raise even dangerous hands like JJ. Then other sites like Paradise everything is brought in for a raise. How are the styles so different on the sites?
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Styles of play at various sites?
I don't know what limits you were watching on Pacific, but I see plenty of raising and reraising preflop at $5/$10 and above.
Dogmeat [img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Styles of play at various sites?
5/10 and it was passive beyond belief almost like they distributed ludes to all the players....... [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img] [img]/images/graemlins/blush.gif[/img]
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Styles of play at various sites?
yeah I have no idea what you are talking about dogmeat. Pacific is one of the most passive site. I think the reason is because of the 888.com casino
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Styles of play at various sites?
[ QUOTE ]
yeah I have no idea what you are talking about dogmeat. Pacific is one of the most passive site. I think the reason is because of the 888.com casino [/ QUOTE ] The reason is actually pretty simple. Pacific doesn't support Pokertracker and they only let you play one table. Thus, the site isn't infested with 15,000 2+2 multitablers. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Styles of play at various sites?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] yeah I have no idea what you are talking about dogmeat. Pacific is one of the most passive site. I think the reason is because of the 888.com casino [/ QUOTE ] The reason is actually pretty simple. Pacific doesn't support Pokertracker and they only let you play one table. Thus, the site isn't infested with 15,000 2+2 multitablers. [/ QUOTE ] Im pretty sure it is supported by PT. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Styles of play at various sites?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] yeah I have no idea what you are talking about dogmeat. Pacific is one of the most passive site. I think the reason is because of the 888.com casino [/ QUOTE ] The reason is actually pretty simple. Pacific doesn't support Pokertracker and they only let you play one table. Thus, the site isn't infested with 15,000 2+2 multitablers. [/ QUOTE ] Im pretty sure it is supported by PT. [/ QUOTE ] Yeah, my bad. But I still think they only allow one table, so that keeps the legion of multitablers from dominating the site. |
|
|