MMMMMM Advocates Violence Against Americans - Page 2

Arnfinn Madsen · #11 08-18-2005, 11:08 AM

What are you talking about? What have I missed?

LaggyLou · #12 08-18-2005, 11:11 AM

[ QUOTE ]
What are you talking about? What have I missed?

[/ QUOTE ]

Please see this thread.

mackthefork · #13 08-18-2005, 11:20 AM

I don't think the guy spoken of in that thread was threatening violence, rather i think he was venting his frustration at the protestors. They had in my opinion out stayed the welcome he extended, and it was coming up to dove season FFS (whatever that is).

Regards Mack

Arnfinn Madsen · #14 08-18-2005, 11:22 AM

Are you talking about the banning of Jokerswild? Why so cryptic? We who have IQ less than 80 want to understand your posts too [img]/images/graemlins/crazy.gif[/img].

LaggyLou · #15 08-18-2005, 11:29 AM

[ QUOTE ]
I don't think the guy spoken of in that thread was threatening violence, rather i think he was venting his frustration at the protestors. They had in my opinion out stayed the welcome he extended, and it was coming up to dove season FFS (whatever that is).

[/ QUOTE ]

Meh. I am uninterested in that guy. And, BTW, dove season doesn't start until September 20.

LaggyLou · #16 08-18-2005, 11:35 AM

[ QUOTE ]
Are you talking about the banning of Jokerswild? Why so cryptic? We who have IQ less than 80 want to understand your posts too [img]/images/graemlins/crazy.gif[/img].

[/ QUOTE ]

My post is indeed a response to MMMMMM's "explanation" for the banning of jokerswild. To spell it out, MMMMMM's position is that jokerswild was banned because jokerswild "defamed" MMMMMM by stating that MMMMMM advocated violence against Americans.

In fact, MMMMMM does advocate violence against Americans, as I have stated. Truthful statements (and statements of opinion) are not defamatory.

So we shall see whether MMMMMM (1) admits he was wrong and reinstates jokerswild; (2) exercises his power as moderator to ban me, thereby proving that "defamatory" to him means "somthing I don't like"; or (3) comes up with new explanation as to why jokerswild should be banned, which we shall all then evaluate.

jaxmike · #17 08-18-2005, 11:35 AM

Then who are you referring to? What American citizen is he advocating the deportation of? Do you NOT see the problem with that statement?

jaxmike · #18 08-18-2005, 11:39 AM

[ QUOTE ]
My post is indeed a response to MMMMMM's "explanation" for the banning of jokerswild. To spell it out, MMMMMM's position is that jokerswild was banned because jokerswild "defamed" MMMMMM by stating that MMMMMM advocated violence against Americans.

In fact, MMMMMM does advocate violence against Americans, as I have stated. Truthful statements (and statements of opinion) are not defamatory.

So we shall see whether MMMMMM (1) admits he was wrong and reinstates jokerswild; (2) exercises his power as moderator to ban me, thereby proving that "defamatory" to him means "somthing I don't like"; or (3) comes up with new explanation as to why jokerswild should be banned, which we shall all then evaluate.

[/ QUOTE ]

Question my logic all you want. This is truly impressive compared to anything I have done in the past.

Simply put, how do you justify claiming that MMMMMM supports/advocates/whatever violence against American citizens?

In fact, MMMMMM does advocate violence against Americans, as I have stated.

You wrote. Where is your evidence? In the fact that he banned JW? Do you not see the problem with your assertion?

bobman0330 · #19 08-18-2005, 11:40 AM

Did you read the post that jokerwild made?? Do you understand what he said?

False and defamatory things in that post:
1. You advocate violence against Americans. As you've pointed out, in a tautological way, this is true about MMMMMM and everyone else. Its only reasonable interpretation however, is not true.
2. The ATF is watching you. False and defamatory, no one has claimed otherwise.
3. You are a racist. False and defamatory, no one has claimed otherwise.
4. You are like Tim McVeigh. See above.
5. 2+2 was stupid to make a right-wing extremist like you a moderator. False, but not defamatory.

tylerdurden · #20 08-18-2005, 11:46 AM

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
How is deporting someone a violent act?

[/ QUOTE ]

Are you serious? It's a violation of self-determination by use of force.

[/ QUOTE ]

I am totally serious. Deportation screams non-citizen. Don't forget that IMPORTANT little bit of information.

[/ QUOTE ]

We were talking about violence, not citizenship status. Forced relocation is violent. Period.