Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Limit Texas Hold'em > Micro-Limits
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 06-07-2005, 03:06 PM
mojobluesman mojobluesman is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 248
Default Pocket 99s

Please excuse the check and fold on the flop. I was multi-tabling for the first time and went into a coma. However, while reviewing the hand after the fact, I found that it would have been very difficult to deal with even if I had attempted to play it.

The pot was fairly large because of a pre-flop raiser.

A straight flush draw flopped.

I'm 2nd to act against a possible straight and possible flush (almost certainly draws to 1 or both if they aren't already out), 5 potential overcards to my pocket 99s, and a pre flop raiser that could already have me beaten with a higher pair.

Obviously, even if I am ahead at this point I am in very deep trouble with only 2 outs to a redraw and a million ways to lose. I may also already be toast.

A bet on my part would do nothing to protect my hand. In fact, even if I bet and the pre-flop raiser raised me, that would not protect my hand from open ended straight and flush draws. The best it would do is knock out a few overcards that weren't also flush draws. In fact, if he raised me I'd be tempted to fold because it could be an indication he had a pair (which most likely would be higher than mine because he was the pre flop raiser).

I also don't see how a check raise to protect could work from this position.

Usually when I'm in a situation like this, if I'm going to play, I try to get myself into a situation where I wait for the turn to raise to protect my hand. From this position, I don't see how that was possible either.

Any suggestions?

Now let's assume I bet and the pre flop raiser raises.

Do I fold on the assumption that he probably has me beat?

If I bet, he calls and someone else raises with either a STR8/Flush value raise or a raise because they already have it then what?

It seems to me that if I bet I was likely to get involved in a huge pot that I was likely to lose (and could even be drawing practically dead in).

However, check/fold seems so darn weak that it probably wasn't right either.

I will post the rest of the hand and further questions afterwards.

Party Poker 1/2 Hold'em (8 handed) converter

Preflop: Hero is UTG with 9[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img], 9[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img].
Hero calls, <font color="#666666">1 fold</font>, <font color="#CC3333">MP1 raises</font>, MP2 calls, <font color="#666666">3 folds</font>, BB calls, Hero calls.

Flop: (8.50 SB) 5[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img], 4[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img], 3[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(4 players)</font>
BB checks, Hero checks, <font color="#CC3333">MP1 bets</font>, MP2 calls, BB folds, Hero folds.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 06-07-2005, 03:09 PM
shadow29 shadow29 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: ATL
Posts: 178
Default Re: Pocket 99s

You need to raise this pf. Especially at 1/2.

I think that the fold is fine.

edit- ignore me, I'm a weak tight pussy. [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 06-07-2005, 03:11 PM
MrWookie47 MrWookie47 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: ^^ That wookie
Posts: 1,485
Default Re: Pocket 99s

This hand becomes a completely different beast if you raise preflop.

BTW, you should never think about trying to get OESDs and flush draws to fold from improper odds. It will virtually never happen. Bet anyways, for value.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 06-07-2005, 03:12 PM
sin808 sin808 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Everson, WA
Posts: 38
Default Re: Pocket 99s

given the board I think folding here is ok. Had it been ragged then a bet would be good I think.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 06-07-2005, 03:13 PM
jrz1972 jrz1972 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 368
Default Re: Pocket 99s

Bet the flop for value (not for protection, which is impossible here) and go from there. If raised by the preflop aggressor, I would probably call down as long as no more hearts appear. (The preflop aggressor could easily be holding a big [img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img]).

Basically, you're thinking on this hand is completely wrong. There is no possible way to protect your hand against flush and straight draws. Rather, you should be betting for value while you are (hopefully) ahead.

On a side note, I would PFR with this.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 06-07-2005, 03:16 PM
billy51 billy51 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 48
Default Re: Pocket 99s

The pot is too big to fold for one bet on the flop, even on this scary board. I think calling the flop and hoping for a safe turn card is best (although, I admit there are not many safe cards).

Frankly, I'm not sure how best to proceed on the turn if a favorable card comes. It probably depends on the card.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 06-07-2005, 03:17 PM
mojobluesman mojobluesman is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 248
Default Re: Pocket 99s

I understand the rationale behind raising 99s and TTs from early position on these slightly tighter tables. Obviously we want fewer opponents. However, very few of the cookie cutter pre flop charts suggest raising 99s and some don't even suggest raising TTs. Even the chart from ITH (Hilger), which is more sensitive to how many callers there are prior to you and whether or not you are first in suggests just a call with 99s and TTs from EP.

I guess my skill level is still suspect enough that I don't feel confident playing the middle pairs. I am reluctant to raise at this stage.

Would you also raise from EP with 88s?

What about 88s, 99s, TTs if you are not first in?

A limp before?
A raise before?

TY in advance.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 06-07-2005, 03:20 PM
Aaron W. Aaron W. is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 87
Default Re: Pocket 99s

[ QUOTE ]
Please excuse the check and fold on the flop. I was multi-tabling for the first time and went into a coma. However, while reviewing the hand after the fact, I found that it would have been very difficult to deal with even if I had attempted to play it.

The pot was fairly large because of a pre-flop raiser.

A straight flush draw flopped.

I'm 2nd to act against a possible straight and possible flush (almost certainly draws to 1 or both if they aren't already out), 5 potential overcards to my pocket 99s, and a pre flop raiser that could already have me beaten with a higher pair.

Obviously, even if I am ahead at this point I am in very deep trouble with only 2 outs to a redraw and a million ways to lose. I may also already be toast.

A bet on my part would do nothing to protect my hand. In fact, even if I bet and the pre-flop raiser raised me, that would not protect my hand from open ended straight and flush draws. The best it would do is knock out a few overcards that weren't also flush draws. In fact, if he raised me I'd be tempted to fold because it could be an indication he had a pair (which most likely would be higher than mine because he was the pre flop raiser).

I also don't see how a check raise to protect could work from this position.

Usually when I'm in a situation like this, if I'm going to play, I try to get myself into a situation where I wait for the turn to raise to protect my hand. From this position, I don't see that was possible either.

Any suggestions?

[/ QUOTE ]

I would check-call one bet and lead the turn if it's not a heart. If it's two bets back to you on the flop, you've got a lot of thinking to do based on what you know of whoever raised (I'm 3-betting an aggressive player, folding against a passive player).

You seem to have MUBS. If the flop came down 862, would you still be worrying about an overpair based on the preflop raise alone? (I hope not -- you should be thinking that he probably has overcards.) The scary board does not affect villain's preflop raising standards. Do you think villain raised preflop with A2? What about 76 or 62? There's only one combination of AK which has two hearts and 6 with one heart, and 9 with no hearts. Don't think of situations in terms of worst case scenarios. You've got to break away from that mindset and think about what is probable.

[ QUOTE ]
Now let's assume I bet and the pre flop raiser raises.

Do I fold on the assumption that he probably has me beat?

[/ QUOTE ]

No. No. No. No. No. He could very easily have a high heart (A[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img]) for a flush draw + gutshot straight.

[ QUOTE ]
If I bet, he calls and someone else raises with either a STR8/Flush value raise or a raise because they already have it then what?

[/ QUOTE ]

I wouldn't worry about a made flush until it gets capped.

[ QUOTE ]
It seems to me that if I bet I was likely to get involved in a huge pot that I was likely to lose (and could even be drawing practically dead in).

[/ QUOTE ]

Thinking that you're drawing practically dead is weak-tight thinking. The odds of a flopped straight or flopped flush is very low.

Also, consider that there are only four players in the pot. If there were six or seven, you've got a much larger chance of things getting bad on the turn (many more cards become dangerous because many more draws are out there against you). Right now, you've got a decent hand. Get to the turn and hope it's a good card for you.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 06-07-2005, 03:21 PM
mojobluesman mojobluesman is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 248
Default Re: Pocket 99s

I thought about a bet for value, but with so many outs against me and the potential I was already well behind the pre-flop raiser or dead against a flush or STR8, do I really have any equity? [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 06-07-2005, 03:22 PM
billy51 billy51 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 48
Default Re: Pocket 99s

[ QUOTE ]
You need to raise this pf. Especially at 1/2.


[/ QUOTE ]
Can you explain why? and why especially at 1/2? I almost always limp with 99 UTG in an attempt to encourage multiway action. I know there is an argument for raising for value, but I think that our edge is very thin, and I think there is usually more value in trying for a multiway pot.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:30 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.