Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Limit Texas Hold'em > Small Stakes Shorthanded

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old 10-10-2005, 07:09 PM
jason_t jason_t is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Another downswing?
Posts: 2,274
Default Re: 4HANDED. PARTY20. 57TP .

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
That does not change my EV calculation because I assumed you put in no more bets on the river when behind.

But, intuitively, don't you see putting in extra bets while 75% likely to be a 2-out dog must be wrong?

[/ QUOTE ]

yes, i do. but we are seeing a showdown. and id rather put in bets on the turn when i have at least 2 outs than on the river when i am drawing dead.

[/ QUOTE ]

And open yourself up to paying a 5th bet on the river?
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 10-10-2005, 07:13 PM
baronzeus baronzeus is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Palo Alto, CA/Bay101
Posts: 2,675
Default Re: 4HANDED. PARTY20. 57TP .

[ QUOTE ]
I see your perspective better now, but I still disagree because I think we can correctly fold on some river cards such as A's and 3's. In fact I think it's very unlikely he bluffs a worse hand unimproved on the river, so we should be seeing a lot of free showdowns against his AK/AQ whatever when he has it. No need to put in the 4th bet on the turn.

[/ QUOTE ]

i think im underestimating how often we get sucked out on here.

but im looking over the hand again and i really think we are ahead more than 25% now. (thanks partygirl [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img]) this is given the description of the player, fv's image, and the board. i really think he can 3bet with any ace here. so im rethinking.
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 10-10-2005, 07:18 PM
flawless_victory flawless_victory is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 144
Default Re: 4HANDED. PARTY20. 57TP .

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I see your perspective better now, but I still disagree because I think we can correctly fold on some river cards such as A's and 3's. In fact I think it's very unlikely he bluffs a worse hand unimproved on the river, so we should be seeing a lot of free showdowns against his AK/AQ whatever when he has it. No need to put in the 4th bet on the turn.

[/ QUOTE ]
given the description of the player, fv's image, and the board. i really think he can 3bet with any two cards here

[/ QUOTE ]no doubt.
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 10-10-2005, 07:39 PM
wheelz wheelz is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: London, Ontario, Canda
Posts: 163
Default Re: 4HANDED. PARTY20. 57TP .

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
so you're saying if he bets the river and you don't improve you're folding??

[/ QUOTE ]depends on timing/card... i dont decide this stuff in advance, generally.

[/ QUOTE ]

so you're taking a line against a guy on tilt where you put in 4 bets no matter what and sometimes fold to a 5th bet, when you could just call down and see a showdown guaranteed for 4 bets. how can that be better?
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 10-10-2005, 07:44 PM
joker122 joker122 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 396
Default Re: 4HANDED. PARTY20. 57TP .

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
That does not change my EV calculation because I assumed you put in no more bets on the river when behind.

But, intuitively, don't you see putting in extra bets while 75% likely to be a 2-out dog must be wrong?

[/ QUOTE ]

yes, i do. but we are seeing a showdown. and id rather put in bets on the turn when i have at least 2 outs than on the river when i am drawing dead.



[/ QUOTE ]

here's the big problem with this - he will still bet the river with an overpair at least some of the time. even if it's a miniscule percent of the time it still cuts into our EV that much.
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 10-10-2005, 07:53 PM
flawless_victory flawless_victory is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 144
Default Re: 4HANDED. PARTY20. 57TP .

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
so you're saying if he bets the river and you don't improve you're folding??

[/ QUOTE ]depends on timing/card... i dont decide this stuff in advance, generally.

[/ QUOTE ]

so you're taking a line against a guy on tilt where you put in 4 bets no matter what and sometimes fold to a 5th bet, when you could just call down and see a showdown guaranteed for 4 bets. how can that be better?

[/ QUOTE ]obviously i dont believe he will bluff the river after i fourbet the turn.. that would be a bit insane... i didnt say he was on full blown tilt, i said " may be a little tilty," or something...
note that i dont have a big problem putting in five bets here.. i wouldve likely bet the river myself if a 9 had come (depends on timing tells), but i thought that 6 would likely prevent Ahigh from calling.
basically being bet into on the end is just not gonna happen often... if he bet an utter blank, id most likely pay it off.
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 10-10-2005, 08:06 PM
wheelz wheelz is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: London, Ontario, Canda
Posts: 163
Default Re: 4HANDED. PARTY20. 57TP .

i can't believe how much you rely on timing tells... i was taught to ignore them.
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 10-10-2005, 11:04 PM
ALL1N ALL1N is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 156
Default Re: 4HANDED. PARTY20. 57TP .

[ QUOTE ]
river 6.
checkcheck.

[/ QUOTE ]

[ QUOTE ]
note that i dont have a big problem putting in five bets here.. i wouldve likely bet the river myself if a 9 had come

[/ QUOTE ]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
so you're saying if he bets the river and you don't improve you're folding??

[/ QUOTE ]depends on timing/card... i dont decide this stuff in advance, generally.

[/ QUOTE ]

So you're capping the turn but you're ahead at a frequency where the river bet is fairly marginal?? It has the feel of a live hand in that you're using a play which relies on the tells it creates in the opponent's reaction to gauge what to do next. I can't say I like capping the turn without a strong sense of how I'm going to play the river - it's online and I reckon you're probably overvaluing the timing tell you'll get here.

Anyway, given what you think of your ability to read him on the river, it seems fine. I wouldn't like the play if you were never value betting the river.
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 10-11-2005, 10:05 PM
flawless_victory flawless_victory is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 144
Default RESULTSSS

he rolled QJo, i busted out laughing.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:30 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.