Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Limit Texas Hold'em > Mid- and High-Stakes Hold'em
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 09-21-2005, 05:44 PM
snakehead snakehead is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: california
Posts: 516
Default Re: Taking a Shot

buy in for $2000. if the game is good, you can add more later if needed. if it's bad, get out asap.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 09-21-2005, 06:20 PM
Jeffage Jeffage is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,047
Default Re: Taking a Shot

Rack of green is plenty for a decent shot. Good luck.

Jeff
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 09-21-2005, 06:25 PM
autobet autobet is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 790
Default Re: Taking a Shot

[ QUOTE ]

How many bets should I quit at? As it stands right now I could lose 40 big bets and still be at a 300 30/60 BB roll. Do I have the funds to take this shot, or should I stick with what I know?



[/ QUOTE ]

Sounds like a rack ($2,500) should be your limit.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 09-21-2005, 08:10 PM
lil feller lil feller is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 66
Default Re: Taking a Shot

You guys have been great. Thanks for the input. I'm gonna make it a day of decision, mostly based on game conditions. I'll post how it works out, if anybody wants to know.

lf
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 09-21-2005, 10:48 PM
elena_elphie elena_elphie is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 10
Default Re: Taking a Shot

I think I learned more about hold 'em from playing with you, than from anyone I've ever played it with. I'm sure you'll do just great at the 50/100, if it is the game I'm thinking of.

Good luck.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 09-22-2005, 02:40 AM
brick brick is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Seattle
Posts: 101
Default Re: Taking a Shot

50/100 at the muck?

[rambling from a guy who took a shot a failed]

I've felt that there are more gamblers in the biggest game at the house, than in the mid-limits, where i see more average play than anything. But to get the gamblers money you're competing against even better players, who tend to be more agressive.
At first glance the games looks better, because the pots are a little bigger, but I'm not sure my winrate would actually be better in the game that "looks" better because of the gamblers. I think the good players are taking their share more efficiently than the mid-stakes players.

I admit it strikes a bit of fear in me to think my winrate may gradually decrease as a I move up, while my variance will gradually increase due to the more agressive games.

[rambling off]

anyway have a great trip whatever you do!
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 09-22-2005, 06:27 AM
Emperor Emperor is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Camelot
Posts: 201
Default Re: Taking a Shot

if you look back into the OLD archive pre2000. you will find a High Limit player who said you should never take shots and that high limit players were all conspiring to get mid players to take shots so they could feed on them.

He was VERY cynical, and his posts were so cynical they were slightly humerous. You guys would all eat him alive now. Course I have a feeling he was older than moses and probably isn't living anymore.

I keep taking shots at 15/30, everytime I do I get RUN OVER. However, I suck at poker, so thats to be expected.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 09-22-2005, 06:58 AM
The Truth The Truth is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 207
Default Re: Taking a Shot

It'll be good for you. You'll get that old adrenaline rush, and it'll renew your drive to progress your game.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:41 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.