Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Other Topics > Science, Math, and Philosophy
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 10-03-2005, 11:49 AM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: A Compromise about ID in Biology Classes

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
This is fine as long as they also teach that if evolution by chance is true it's ok to murder people.

[/ QUOTE ]

How do you get from "evolution by chance is true" to "It's ok to murder people"?

edit: does this qualify as as "totally hijacked"? [img]/images/graemlins/tongue.gif[/img]

[/ QUOTE ]

It's part of his theist talking points.

--> No god = okay to murder anyone you want

Brainwashing is a powerful technique.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 10-03-2005, 11:51 AM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: A Compromise about ID in Biology Classes

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]

How do you get from "evolution by chance is true" to "It's ok to murder people"?


[/ QUOTE ]

If God is dead, all is permitted - Nietzsche, et al.


[/ QUOTE ]

Nietzsche never said or implied such a thing, and lived more morally than probably 95% of all Christians in history.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 10-03-2005, 11:51 AM
Jeff V Jeff V is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 149
Default Re: A Compromise about ID in Biology Classes

[ QUOTE ]
ID proponets are being backed futher and further into a corner

[/ QUOTE ]

I think you have this backwards.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 10-03-2005, 11:52 AM
NotReady NotReady is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 70
Default Re: A Compromise about ID in Biology Classes

[ QUOTE ]

Or, would evolving intelligence create a society where we could choose not to kill? (without fear of hell as the deterrent)


[/ QUOTE ]

Intelligence has nothing to do with it. Most animals don't kill their own kind or even kill at all except for pragmatic reasons (food,group dominance) - humans kill for pleasure. But the example was just for effect, evolution by chance destroys the basis of any and all morality for any reason other than pragmatism.

I think the notion that people obey God's law only because of fear of hell is wrong. It's true that fear of punishment is a strong motivation, but not the only one. Since we are made in God's image we have genuine love of and appreciation for truth and beauty. It is possible to want to do something that's right because it's right, to avoid evil because it's ugly, to love God for Who He is, and to want to be like Him because it's our highest good.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 10-03-2005, 11:53 AM
NotReady NotReady is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 70
Default Re: A Compromise about ID in Biology Classes

[ QUOTE ]

Murder is a property violation, so it's never ok to murder people.


[/ QUOTE ]

Who's talking law?
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 10-03-2005, 11:54 AM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: A Compromise about ID in Biology Classes

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]

Since we are made in God's image we have genuine love of and appreciation for truth and beauty.

[/ QUOTE ]

Of course, there are only billions of counterexamples of humans made in God's image who have no appreciation for any such thing.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 10-03-2005, 11:55 AM
NotReady NotReady is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 70
Default Re: A Compromise about ID in Biology Classes

[ QUOTE ]

Brainwashing is a powerful technique.


[/ QUOTE ]

You have no answer I guess.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 10-03-2005, 11:55 AM
purnell purnell is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 154
Default Re: A Compromise about ID in Biology Classes

[ QUOTE ]
Natural selection would include the strong killing off weaker people, right?

[/ QUOTE ]

I don't see how this makes murder "ok".


[ QUOTE ]
Or, would evolving intelligence create a society where we could choose not to kill? (without fear of hell as the deterrent)

[/ QUOTE ]

We can choose not to kill, no?
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 10-03-2005, 11:56 AM
NotReady NotReady is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 70
Default Re: A Compromise about ID in Biology Classes

[ QUOTE ]

Nietzsche never said or implied such a thing,


[/ QUOTE ]

It was attributed to him as well as Dostoevsky and stated clearly by Sartre. Pick one, I don't care.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 10-03-2005, 11:56 AM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: A Compromise about ID in Biology Classes

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
ID proponets are being backed futher and further into a corner

[/ QUOTE ]

I think you have this backwards.

[/ QUOTE ]

The more folks like you, NotReady, and Peter666 advocate teaching ID, the more it is obvious that the pathologically unreasonable and blissfully ignorant are leading the charge.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:05 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.