Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > General Gambling > Rake Back
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-11-2005, 02:49 AM
CardSharpCook CardSharpCook is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: South of Heaven
Posts: 746
Default Measuring risk/reward when choosing affliates

As this is a process we are all going through right now, I thought I'd take the time to put my thought process into computer type.

OK, what are the risks and rewards involved with affliate selection?

Risks:
1. Affliate never pays you a dime.
2. Affliate gets disavowed by site.
3. Affliate quits after a while and your payments disappear into the nether.

Reward:
1. Rakeback %

Is there a way to diminish the risks?
1. Affliates who do not advertise are less likely to provoke the anger of the Site.
2. Bigger affliates are more likely to both pay and be around to pay in the future.
3. Transfers done on the site are more likely to be condoned by the site? Or are they more likely to arouse ire?

Am I simply overthinking this? Is rakeback approved by the Site and therefore I should just go out and grab the best deal? I had thought that rakeback was both frowned on by party and kept on the DL outside of party. Thus, sites that spammed the tables were more at risk of being cutoff by party. Damn these complicated issues. I wish that party would make a statement.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-11-2005, 02:56 AM
Ulysses Ulysses is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 5,519
Default Re: Measuring risk/reward when choosing affliates

There's one more general class of risk that's very important to consider. Depending on how you create your account and how your affiliate does rakeback, there's probably a small (but non-zero) risk of breaking T&C's that allow party to close the account as fraudulent, including seizing existing funds.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-11-2005, 03:04 AM
wackjob wackjob is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 50
Default Re: Measuring risk/reward when choosing affliates

Another good reason to keep minimum funds in your poker site.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10-11-2005, 03:11 AM
CardSharpCook CardSharpCook is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: South of Heaven
Posts: 746
Default Re: Measuring risk/reward when choosing affliates

Yeah, I don't even want to get into the possible implications of registering under a false name, but they don't stop with simply getting kicked off the site. You run the risk (albeit small one) of being charged with tax fraud. Even worse, if you use a family members name, you could create problems for them with the federal government. Again, probably a small risk, but one I'm unwilling to take.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 10-11-2005, 04:14 AM
StellarWind StellarWind is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 704
Default Re: Measuring risk/reward when choosing affliates

[ QUOTE ]
Yeah, I don't even want to get into the possible implications of registering under a false name, but they don't stop with simply getting kicked off the site. You run the risk (albeit small one) of being charged with tax fraud.

[/ QUOTE ]
It's only tax fraud if you don't pay. Nothing is stopping you from declaring income that was earned under a false name.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:52 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.