#11
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Mason e-mail
[ QUOTE ]
Site operator = scumbag. [/ QUOTE ] I hope you're referring to the other site's operator, and not Mason. I assume you are. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Mason e-mail
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Site operator = scumbag. [/ QUOTE ] I hope you're referring to the other site's operator, and not Mason. I assume you are. [/ QUOTE ] yes. He was asked nicely to take it down and hasn't. Legal or not it seems like a scumbag thing to do. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Mason e-mail
[ QUOTE ]
Pwned, look it up in the dictionary. [/ QUOTE ] Agreed, I am a donk. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Mason e-mail
He was implicitly threatened.
When on the receiving end of a threat demanding an action A, people tend to want to do the opposite of A, especially when they perceive the threat to be a bluff. The desired effect is to reduce the bluffing frequency of one's opponents (while this may not be a good idea in Hold'em, it is often a good idea in life). |
|
|