Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Other Topics > Science, Math, and Philosophy
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-16-2005, 08:46 PM
Marlow Marlow is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 25
Default ethics question

I bought an MP3 player and it does not work. Unfortunately I had a 2 month lag-time between when I bought it and when I tried it out, so the 1 month guarantee ran out. I wrote to the company and they are basically unresponsive.

Would it be unethical to do the following:
-buy the same MP3 player
-bring it home and put the broken one in the new one's box (forgot to mention that wife tossed old package)
-bring broken one back with receipt and get my money back

The way I see it, I'm doing nothing wrong aside from circumventing a stupid company policy. The end result is essentially the same as if I returned it to begin with and just got one that worked.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-16-2005, 08:49 PM
Scotch78 Scotch78 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 1
Default Re: ethics question

This is like stressing over whether you should have checked the flop with a royal flush because everyone folded. Just do it.

Scott
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-16-2005, 09:12 PM
Dan Rutter Dan Rutter is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: WI
Posts: 23
Default Re: ethics question

I would say if you did that it would be slightly unethical. It is not the company's fault you did not check to see if the MP3 player worked until two months after you purchased it. The warranty is figured into the price of the MP3 somewhere, and you used the warranty up during the first month after purchase. So you got that service, you just never used it.

Bring it into the store and see if they will help you, if they continue to be unresponsive to your letter.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-16-2005, 09:45 PM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: ethics question

Almost everything electronic has a 1 year parts & labor warranty. If it doesn't, then the company must think it's product is low quality or something. What brand/model is this? I'd do the switcheroo.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-17-2005, 05:40 PM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: ethics question

You have my ok so I guess that means you should do it. After all, who is better left to decide your ethical decisions than I, some random stranger over the internet?
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 11-17-2005, 05:54 PM
Peter666 Peter666 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 346
Default Re: ethics question

Well they didn't answer you so f*ck-em and do the switch.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 11-17-2005, 06:29 PM
hmkpoker hmkpoker is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 116
Default Re: ethics question

Most MP3 players have serial or other ID numbers on both them and the packaging. This could lead to a flaw in your plan, and I guess there's an argument about reverse implied odds.

Why on earth would you buy an MP3 player without an extended warranty?
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 11-17-2005, 09:15 PM
Marlow Marlow is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 25
Default Re: ethics question

About 3 hours after I posted this, the company returned my email. So while I have very little faith in them overall, I'm going to try the str8 and narrow path first. Not that I think swapping is exactly unethical (still on the fence about this).

Thanks for all your responses.

Oh, and the company is iRiver.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:31 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.