Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Other Topics > Politics
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #151  
Old 06-21-2005, 11:35 AM
MMMMMM MMMMMM is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 4,103
Default Re: Religious nut slowly roasted

Cyrus:

Obviously I am saying that sex in single-partner relationships, or infrequent sex, is safer than sex with multiple partners or frequent new partners.

Now I KNOW that might be hard for you to digest, in all its deep complexity....but if you think about it it DOES stand to reason, doesn't it?
Reply With Quote
  #152  
Old 06-21-2005, 11:37 AM
MMMMMM MMMMMM is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 4,103
Default Re: Religious nut slowly roasted

Kurto, that you think that is a good catch just shows you are not thinking clearly.

I'll repeat it once more for YOUR benefit this time:

Obviously I am saying that sex with a single partner, or infrequent sex, is safer than sex with multiple or frequent (new) partners.

Pretty simple, eh, isn't it...when you just THINK about it?
Reply With Quote
  #153  
Old 06-21-2005, 12:06 PM
kurto kurto is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Connecticutt
Posts: 41
Default Re: Religious nut slowly roasted

[ QUOTE ]
Obviously I am saying that sex with a single partner, or infrequent sex, is safer than sex with multiple or frequent (new) partners.



[/ QUOTE ]

That would be simple if that is what you said. Instead, you made some muddled argument where you contradicted yourself.

Perhaps you should have just said that above.

This is one of those times where you're being stubborn. What you are now saying is different then what you said before. Whether you intended to or not, you contradicted yourself. All you have to do is say, "oops, what I meant to say was...." but instead you choose the 'dig my hole deeper' route.
Reply With Quote
  #154  
Old 06-21-2005, 12:09 PM
MMMMMM MMMMMM is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 4,103
Default Re: Religious nut slowly roasted

Kurto,

Go back and carefully reread all my posts in this thread and you will clearly see there was no contradiction.
Reply With Quote
  #155  
Old 06-21-2005, 08:16 PM
Cyrus Cyrus is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Tundra
Posts: 1,720
Default Warning! Canadian soldiers in Vietnam sighted!

[ QUOTE ]
...you made some muddled argument where you contradicted yourself.

[/ QUOTE ]

I'm warning you that the man you are having a debate with once famously twisted the English language to its extremes in order to prove that Ann Coulter did not blunder on TV!
Reply With Quote
  #156  
Old 06-21-2005, 08:58 PM
MMMMMM MMMMMM is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 4,103
Default Re: Warning! Canadian soldiers in Vietnam sighted!

Cyrus learn to read precisely and to think with precision about what you read. Please.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:40 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.