Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Limit Texas Hold'em > Mid- and High-Stakes Hold'em
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-30-2005, 05:57 PM
Nigel Nigel is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Witness Protection Program
Posts: 736
Default BK and Schneids KQ vs. KQ, question for BK

BK,

I know you felt you should have raised the river since you typed it in the chat, but isn't raising the river in this spot basically a must?

I've run into a handful of these spots recently where my read on a guy bluffing or semi-bluffing is so strong and I call river to find my KQ loses to A2, or my AJ to AQ, that sort of thing. Basically I'm trying to trust my read and bet or raise the river more when I don't hold the nut nothing. Do you find it's better to raise in these spots and pop it, possibly folding a low pair even, or rely on the fact that your hand is strong enough to beat most nothing hands and you lose only 1 bet if wrong.

Thoughts?

(Here's the hand for those who want to see it sorry it's in raw form)

***** Hand History for Game 2802286244 *****
$15/$30 Texas Hold'em - Friday, September 30, 17:49:36 EDT 2005
Table SkiStrike's pvt table 1 (Real Money)
Seat 6 is the button
Total number of players : 6
Seat 2: Papa_WarBuck ( $925 )
Seat 3: Fate18 ( $1172 )
Seat 4: NOT_TSP ( $2053.50 )
Seat 5: SkiStrike ( $1156.50 )
Seat 6: LAtoLV ( $1404 )
Seat 1: Prodigy_X ( $1019 )
Prodigy_X posts small blind [$10].
Papa_WarBuck posts big blind [$15].
** Dealing down cards **
Fate18 folds.
NOT_TSP folds.
SkiStrike raises [$30].
LAtoLV folds.
Prodigy_X folds.
Papa_WarBuck calls [$15].
** Dealing Flop ** [ 9d, Td, 7h ]
Papa_WarBuck checks.
SkiStrike bets [$15].
Papa_WarBuck calls [$15].
** Dealing Turn ** [ 4c ]
Papa_WarBuck bets [$30].
SkiStrike calls [$30].
** Dealing River ** [ 8c ]
Papa_WarBuck bets [$30].
SkiStrike calls [$30].
Papa_WarBuck shows [ Qs, Ks ] high card king.
SkiStrike shows [ Qh, Kc ] high card king.
Papa_WarBuck wins $108.50 from the main pot with high card king.
SkiStrike wins $108.50 from the main pot with high card king
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 09-30-2005, 06:00 PM
flawless_victory flawless_victory is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 144
Default Re: BK and Schneids KQ vs. KQ, question for BK

that river call is looking pretty nasty.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 09-30-2005, 06:06 PM
bicyclekick bicyclekick is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Morris, MN
Posts: 416
Default Re: BK and Schneids KQ vs. KQ, question for BK

lol not playing serious bud. I'm not playing totally retarded...but yeah.

Testing a few thoughts/theories while playing a bunch of other tables. Messing around in hands with schneider is def at the top of the list.

I agree I should raise if i do anything other than fold but i'm a retard and didn't do it lol.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 09-30-2005, 06:11 PM
Nigel Nigel is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Witness Protection Program
Posts: 736
Default Re: BK and Schneids KQ vs. KQ, question for BK

Once he donked the turn I expected you would be calling down, given the history between you two. But thats why I was curious about this specific hand, simply because I wondered if your hesitancy to raise was based on the fact that he tends to refuse to be bluffed and might call with any hand that beats you, and otherwise you basically you beat most hands that are total air.

I thought it was kind of interesting as, like I said, it paralelled similar situations that I have been in recently agaisnt a similar type of opponent.

Thanks,

Nigel
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 09-30-2005, 06:19 PM
Schneids Schneids is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Eagan, MN
Posts: 1,084
Default Re: BK and Schneids KQ vs. KQ, question for BK

In a 2p2 15/30 game BK will have zero bluff equity vs me and I'm pretty sure he's aware of that fact. But I'm also aware he knows this, blah blah repeat loop times 4.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 09-30-2005, 06:22 PM
Nigel Nigel is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Witness Protection Program
Posts: 736
Default Re: BK and Schneids KQ vs. KQ, question for BK

[ QUOTE ]
blah blah repeat loop times 4.

[/ QUOTE ]

Lol. Exactly.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 09-30-2005, 07:33 PM
Klepton Klepton is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: don\'t worry i play well post-flop
Posts: 310
Default Re: BK and Schneids KQ vs. KQ, question for BK

BK is skistrike?

i always throught he was a lucky fish [img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 09-30-2005, 07:33 PM
steveyz steveyz is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 142
Default Re: BK and Schneids KQ vs. KQ, question for BK

I believe that's where game theory would come in handy. Pretty hard to sufficiently randomize your play optimally in real time though.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 09-30-2005, 07:33 PM
bicyclekick bicyclekick is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Morris, MN
Posts: 416
Default Re: BK and Schneids KQ vs. KQ, question for BK

[ QUOTE ]
BK is skistrike?

i always throught he was a lucky fish [img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img]

[/ QUOTE ]

uh huh.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:10 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.