Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > General Poker Discussion > Beginners Questions
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #1  
Old 11-16-2005, 06:34 PM
Ryno Ryno is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: SoCal
Posts: 122
Default Interesting drawdown study

{Note - I did this in Excel in like 30 minutes so it's possible I made an error - however, I believe the results to be correct}

Suppose you have the choice of playing 1 table of 30-60 at a winrate of 1.6BB/100, or 4 tables of 15-30 with a winrate of 0.97BB/100 each. Take these winrates as given. In both cases your stdev/100 is 18BB (shorthanded play - I am also assuming 100 hands per hour per table).

If you assume poker hands are iid normally distrubted, then multitabling is the better choice. Your hourly expected earn is 0.97*30*4 = $116.40, with a stdev of $1080. The expected earn playing 1 table is 1.6*60 = $96, with the same $1080 stdev.

How about drawdowns? I define drawdown as the difference between your current bankroll and the highest it's ever been. In the studies below, I used a monte-carlo simulation over 1000 hours, meant to represent 1 years' worth of play.

The chances of experiencing a $30,000 peak-to-trough drawdown under the single-table assumptions is about 7.9%. Under the multi-table assumptions, the chances of a $30,000 drawdown drop to 4.6%.

Now, change the player profiles a little bit.

Sam the single tabler plays better when he's running good. His expected winrate is:

2BB/100 when he's within 50BB of his alltime high.
1.5BB/100 when he's between 50 and 150BB from his alltime high.
1.0BB/100 when he's in a >150BB drawdown.

Marty the multitabler has similar characteristics:

1.5BB/100 when he's within 50BB of his alltime high.
1.0BB/100 when he's between 50 and 150BB from his alltime high.
0.5BB/100 when he's in a >150BB drawdown.

It so happens that Sam's long-run winrate is 1.6BB/100, same as my first example, and Marty's winrate is 0.97BB/100, also same as my multitable example above.

The chances of Sam experiencing a $30,000 peak-to-trough drawdown are 17.8% - more than double the number I got when I assume he plays the same all the time.

The probability of Marty experiencing a $30,000 drawdown is 20.7%, even worse than Sid, and over 4 times worse than someone who can maintain an identical winrate through good times and bad.
Reply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:23 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.