The death of 1000nl on Party

Neurotoxin · #1 09-11-2005, 12:53 AM

Someone should do an anthropological study on the herd mentality that caused virtually every single 1000nl (full ring) player on Party to move up to 2000nl. There's no way they can all afford it. I'm bitching because Stars has filled the niche, and A) I don't get rakeback, and B) I don't completely trust stars RNG.

If Party had better management they'd severely limit access to those 2000nl tables for a while to let the 1000s breathe.

Allinlife · #2 09-11-2005, 12:55 AM

wtf are you talking about

Neurotoxin · #3 09-11-2005, 12:56 AM

Oops, ill edit to clarify full ring games.

AZK · #4 09-11-2005, 01:57 AM

A lot of the 5/10 players play the 3/6 full on party now. Play 6max, it's a better game anyway.

Lucky · #5 09-11-2005, 05:26 AM

[ QUOTE ]
Play 6max, it's a better game anyway.

[/ QUOTE ]

Yep. I played some full ring tonight for the first time in a while and almost fell asleep. Bunch of weak/tighties sittin around waiting for a set.

jdp · #6 09-11-2005, 07:16 AM

If you could afford the 1k games why not the 2k?

GoblinMason (Craig) · #7 09-11-2005, 07:52 AM

[ QUOTE ]
If you could afford the 1k games why not the 2k?

[/ QUOTE ]

Are you kidding?

kyro · #8 09-11-2005, 09:30 AM

[ QUOTE ]
B) I don't completely trust stars RNG.

[/ QUOTE ]

I'm going to step in where I don't belong and ask you to elaborate on this statement.

Chris Daddy Cool · #9 09-11-2005, 10:04 AM

[ QUOTE ]
If you could afford the 1k games why not the 2k?

[/ QUOTE ]

maybe because it's twice as big?

TheWorstPlayer · #10 09-11-2005, 02:43 PM

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
If you could afford the 1k games why not the 2k?

[/ QUOTE ]

maybe because it's twice as big?

[/ QUOTE ]
No, that's not it....