PF CC Survey

[MicroBob]

No I Don't!!!!
And anyway, I'm not that kind of guy so take your sick, perverted ideas elsewhere if you please.


How about #'s 7-10 with:
UTG raises, UTG+1 re-raises, UTG+2 caps, MP1 calls, MP2 calls, MP3 calls, LP1 and CO fold,
you are on the button with each of the previous hands (7 through 10)

Would it make a difference if you were playing these at a B&M and saw that the EP guys were going to call the cap?? If so then go ahead and include that information (or not).


OR change the scenario to being in the BB with each of the hands (so you're only calling 3-cold for the cap).


or:

4 limpers and you have each of these in MP and limp.
fold to button who raises, UTG re-raises, UTG+1 caps (hey, it's Party, anything's possible), next two guys fold and call (or maybe call and call, whatever you like if it makes a difference for you)
it comes back to you capped. Call 3-cold here in MP??


Sorry for getting weird and asking odd questions.
I truly am curious where some of you guys stand here.


Anyway, thanks so far for the responses. Very interesting.

FWIW - In some of these situations I might almost prefer JTs or Axs over JJ (or maybe even QQ).

[chesspain]

I'ld call 1,4,5. Everything else goes into the muck.

[John Biggs]

[ QUOTE ]
FWIW - In some of these situations I might almost prefer JTs or Axs over JJ (or maybe even QQ).

[/ QUOTE ]

Why would you ever prefer a suited drawing hand over a big pair? Even if you think you are up against an overpair, you can still angle for a set.

Maybe just another sick joke on your part?!?

[MicroBob]

6 or 7-way pot that's been raised or capped or whatever I suspect JTs or Axs can take a bigger pot a greater majority of the time then JJ....
but I did say "might almost prefer".


Since we don't get to choose our pre-flop cards it doesn't exactly matter what I would prefer to have anyway.

What matters is if and where any of these hands are +EV to actually see a flop.


Thanks again for the responses gang (all except for that pee-ing bit....ewwwwww).

[sfer]

For easy interpretation, I'll add my comments to your text:

UTG raises, all 6 players cold-call (no one has folded yet)
you:
1. 65s on button
Fold
2. K2s on button
Fold
3. Q8s on button
Fold
4. 22 on button
Call


UTG raises, next 3 players cold-call,
you:
5. MP with 22
Call
6. MP with 98s
Fold

UTG raises, UTG+1 re-raises, UTG+2 caps, MP calls
you:
7. MP with 99
Fold
8. MP with JTs
Fold
9. MP with 65s
Fold
10. MP with A6s
Fold

I never coldcall with suited connectors.

[MaxPower]

UTG raises, all 6 players cold-call (no one has folded yet)
you:
1. 65s on button

I don't think it matters much.

2. K2s on button

Fold but I think its close.

3. Q8s on button

Fold but I think its close.

4. 22 on button

Call.

UTG raises, next 3 players cold-call,
you:
5. MP with 22

Call

6. MP with 98s

Call but I think its close.

UTG raises, UTG+1 re-raises, UTG+2 caps, MP calls
you:
7. MP with 99

Fold

8. MP with JTs

Fold

9. MP with 65s

Fold

10. MP with A6s

Fold


And I don't play particularly tight.

[Victor]

I would fold 7-10 and 3.

[dfscott]

UTG raises, all 6 players cold-call (no one has folded yet)
you:
1. 65s on button - Call
2. K2s on button - Fold
3. Q8s on button - Borderline, but probably fold
4. 22 on button - Call

UTG raises, next 3 players cold-call,
you:
5. MP with 22 - Call
6. MP with 98s - Call

UTG raises, UTG+1 re-raises, UTG+2 caps, MP calls
you:
7. MP with 99 - Fold
8. MP with JTs - Fold
9. MP with 65s - Fold
10. MP with A6s - Fold

[Rico Suave]

Sfer:

ditto

--Rico

[Vazh]

[ QUOTE ]
I never coldcall with suited connectors.

[/ QUOTE ]
I was starting to think I was the only one.