|
|
|
|
#1
12-21-2005, 03:34 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: full ring vs. 6-max
[ QUOTE ]
I am fully convinced and as evidenced by playing against miles last night, 6 max seems to be mostly an action junky almost pure luck game. And I am the unluckiest player at it, which probably just means I suck. [/ QUOTE ] it seems that way at first, it gets better once you get used to it more, and get comfortable in blindsteal, and defend situations 
|
|
#2
12-21-2005, 10:55 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: full ring vs. 6-max
[ QUOTE ]
I am fully convinced and as evidenced by playing against miles last night, 6 max seems to be mostly an action junky almost pure luck game. And I am the unluckiest player at it, which probably just means I suck. [/ QUOTE ] If you are who I think you are, I played against you. I thought you were too aggressive in the wrong spots. You called down a couple times with small pp's when I showed aggression with overcards falling. It may seem like it's luck, or laggy, but you have to pick your spots, and reads are highly important. Keep playing and gl. edit: read the small stakes short forum, lots of goot stuff in there.
|
|
#3
12-20-2005, 01:47 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: full ring vs. 6-max
[ QUOTE ]
In Ed Miller's magazine column he suggests that anyone playing full ring games should drop down a limit and start playing the 6 max tables there . Has anyone tried this or have good stats/experience to compare these 2 kinds of games? [/ QUOTE ] Full ring is like cocaine and 6-max is like crack. I'm sure people have already provided some good links (you see, I'm grunching). My fear is that when I walk into a full-ring live game next week, it will be like a nice cup of coffee.
|
 |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
