(55) fishy limp-call?

[schwza]

don't remember reads.

Party Poker No-Limit Hold'em Tourney, Big Blind is t30 (10 handed) converter

MP3 (t1060)
CO (t830)
Hero (t1075)
SB (t705)
BB (t1100)
UTG (t1225)
UTG+1 (t1460)
UTG+2 (t970)
MP1 (t695)
MP2 (t880)

Preflop: Hero is Button with 7[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img], 7[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img].
<font color="#666666">1 fold</font>, UTG+1 calls t30, <font color="#666666">1 fold</font>, MP1 calls t30, <font color="#666666">1 fold</font>, MP3 calls t30, CO calls t30, Hero calls t30, <font color="#CC3333">SB raises to t225</font>, <font color="#666666">1 fold</font>, UTG+1 folds, MP1 folds, MP3 folds, CO folds, Hero calls t195.

[11t]

Yah this is pretty awful, you are gonna get bet off of your hand a good % of the time.

If you were getting odds to implied odds to draw to a set, calling here is one thing but you aren't. I'd prefer a limp then push over the top of this raise than a limp call.

I think so. Under 2:1 pot odds to basically call for a set. Without a read, the only non-pair I see him raising a bunch of limpers OOP with is AK. Most likely you're a 4:1 dog though. If he did this with a small pair, tip your hat to him and take his money later.

[downtown]

1) I like when you say there were no reads. This is more realistic for multitablers. Unless I notice a particular donk or regular, it's usually my situation that I have no reads in situations such as this.

2) I instafold this facing the raise, assuming there's not a read that tells me not to. See #1.

[schwza]

yeah, i hated this call as soon as i made it. i thought in the moment that it would be profitable to get it in on any non-A flop (except stuff like KQT) and fold otherwise, but in retrospect i agree that i'm drawing to 2 7's too often.

the flop came AKQ, villain pushed, i folded, and he showed AQ.

77 is not typically a calling hand unless you are getting odds to hit your set. I would fold this again almost all raises.

[bigt439]

[ QUOTE ]
Yah this is pretty awful, you are gonna get bet off of your hand a good % of the time.

If you were getting odds to implied odds to draw to a set, calling here is one thing but you aren't. I'd prefer a limp then push over the top of this raise than a limp call.

[/ QUOTE ]

It should be emphasized just how terrible this call is. Not to bug the OP, but to make sure he never does this again.

[schwza]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Yah this is pretty awful, you are gonna get bet off of your hand a good % of the time.

If you were getting odds to implied odds to draw to a set, calling here is one thing but you aren't. I'd prefer a limp then push over the top of this raise than a limp call.

[/ QUOTE ]

It should be emphasized just how terrible this call is. Not to bug the OP, but to make sure he never does this again.

[/ QUOTE ]

hehe, thanks. that is the purpose of the post [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]