Party Poker $55's or Pokerstars $60 turbos?

[gisb0rne]

I currently 8-table the PStars $27 turbos about 15 hours a week and would like to spend some of my additional free time making a move at a higher buy-in. My ROI at the $27's is around 15-20% over 1500 or so and I plan on continuing to play them while I try out the $55/60's.

PP +/-
1. Can only 4-table. Is this still accurate?
2. More tables/shorter wait for new tourneys
3. Horrible lobby which sometimes contributes to my flip-outs

PStars +/-
1. I love the software.
2. I love the tourney structure.
3. Can 8+ table.
4. Not as many tourneys going on at once...8-tabling when there's only 15 or so $60's means I might face a larger number of good players and have to wait longer for a tourney to start.
5. More tourneys/hour? (I know that I play more per hour at the $27's than at the PP $55's)

I don't know which game is easier to beat. I played at Eurobet while rakeback was an option and the $27's are significantly softer imo than the PP $55's and even the $33's.

I'd appreciate any advice.

[handsome]

You can 10-table on Party. Stick with Stars unless you're willing to adjust to the Party structure.

[gisb0rne]

Thanks for the reply.

I posted this on the wrong forum, sorry.