Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Other Topics > Politics
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old 08-25-2005, 10:43 AM
superleeds superleeds is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 309
Default Re: The terawatt challenge (R. Smalley)

[ QUOTE ]
LOL! Government has ONE goal - the preservation and expansion of its own power

[/ QUOTE ]

And I thought I was a cynic [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 08-25-2005, 10:46 AM
The once and future king The once and future king is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Snob Academy getting my PHD.
Posts: 606
Default Re: The terawatt challenge (R. Smalley)

Apollo progamme/market solution not necessarily mutualy exclusive.
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 08-25-2005, 10:51 AM
The once and future king The once and future king is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Snob Academy getting my PHD.
Posts: 606
Default Re: The terawatt challenge (R. Smalley)

[ QUOTE ]
LOL! Government has ONE goal - the preservation and expansion of its own power.

[/ QUOTE ]

This is true even when Reagan and Thatcher are in power [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img]. Ridiculous and intellectualy lazy over generalisation.
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 08-25-2005, 11:12 AM
tylerdurden tylerdurden is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: actually pvn
Posts: 0
Default Re: The terawatt challenge (R. Smalley)

[ QUOTE ]
If this is true how can a market made up of these type of people (who are obviously in the majority) ever be described as rational??

[/ QUOTE ]

Every conscious action is intended to improve a person's satisfaction. I'm not concerned with any particular person's definition of satisfaction, only with how they pursue it.
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 08-25-2005, 11:13 AM
tylerdurden tylerdurden is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: actually pvn
Posts: 0
Default Re: The terawatt challenge (R. Smalley)

[ QUOTE ]
This is true even when Reagan and Thatcher are in power [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img].

[/ QUOTE ]

Sure. No argument there.

[ QUOTE ]
Ridiculous and intellectualy lazy over generalisation.

[/ QUOTE ]

Care to provide a counterexample?
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 08-25-2005, 11:21 AM
tylerdurden tylerdurden is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: actually pvn
Posts: 0
Default Re: The terawatt challenge (R. Smalley)

[ QUOTE ]
Apollo progamme/market solution not necessarily mutualy exclusive.

[/ QUOTE ]

True. That doesn't change the fact that the government program would be inefficient, bloated, and politically manipulated to produce a centrally-approved result.
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 08-25-2005, 11:23 AM
superleeds superleeds is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 309
Default Re: The terawatt challenge (R. Smalley)

[ QUOTE ]
Care to provide a counterexample?

[/ QUOTE ]

Britain 1945. The course it chose almost guaranteed that it's influence would be drasticly reduced. If it's one goal was to maintain and extend its power it would not have gone to war with Germany but rather it would have sought some kind of pact. There is historical evidence to suggest Hitler was open to this.
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 08-25-2005, 12:03 PM
The once and future king The once and future king is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Snob Academy getting my PHD.
Posts: 606
Default Re: The terawatt challenge (R. Smalley)

Under Thatch the UK government cut its upper Income tax rate from 60% to 40%. It also privatised seversal state run industries such as rail, Gas and telecomms. If it was seeking to increase its powers at all times why did it do this?

I dont disagree that governments can and do seek to increase there power but the assertion that they do this at all times is a gross oversimplification.
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 08-25-2005, 12:38 PM
tylerdurden tylerdurden is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: actually pvn
Posts: 0
Default Re: The terawatt challenge (R. Smalley)

[ QUOTE ]
Under Thatch the UK government cut its upper Income tax rate from 60% to 40%. It also privatised seversal state run industries such as rail, Gas and telecomms. If it was seeking to increase its powers at all times why did it do this?

[/ QUOTE ]

Because the thatcherites wanted to remain in power.
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 08-25-2005, 12:57 PM
microbet microbet is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Southern California
Posts: 1,360
Default Re: The terawatt challenge (R. Smalley)

FWIW, I think central planning is going too far, but I think it is fine for the gubmint to encourage/require new energy research and conservation to some extent.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:43 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.