Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Limit Texas Hold'em > Small Stakes Hold'em
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 12-21-2005, 06:40 PM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: TT vs.a small army of coldcallers

If you bet/fold the turn. what do you do on the river if he just calls your turn bet???
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 12-21-2005, 06:48 PM
ackid ackid is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Heads up, at the Trop..
Posts: 87
Default Re: TT vs.a small army of coldcallers

Preflop and flop are perfect.

Turn I would bet/ fold to raise.

River im check/calling if I get there.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 12-21-2005, 07:58 PM
Jake (The Snake) Jake (The Snake) is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 93
Default Re: TT vs.a small army of coldcallers

Betting the river here would not be a Clarkmeister.

You need to have been the aggressor on the previous street.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 12-21-2005, 08:01 PM
Jake (The Snake) Jake (The Snake) is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 93
Default Re: TT vs.a small army of coldcallers

[ QUOTE ]

For those who like bet/folding the turn...

Is there any fear of a free shodown raise? Or a semibluff raise with (for instance) a nine and a club?

Like I said, the villain didn't seem particularly tricky, but I think these are things any good TAG will do at least once in a while.

[/ QUOTE ]

While I don't really agree that raising with those types of hands would be correct, I do see TAG's doing those kinds of plays all the time and I certainly think bet/call should be an option on the turn against some opponents.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 12-21-2005, 08:08 PM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: TT vs.a small army of coldcallers

[ QUOTE ]
check/call the river . . .

you are probably going to lose (if he bets) but you are getting 13:1 on the river call so I'd take the risk


[/ QUOTE ]

On the turn you can save a bb by folding to a raise (assuming we don't know the K [img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] is coming) . . . however after we bet if he calls . . . check/call will still be a good play 13:1 on the T high flush river
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 12-22-2005, 01:06 AM
chesspain chesspain is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Southern New Hampshire
Posts: 1,930
Default Re: TT vs.a small army of coldcallers

Does anyone else think that the Button's hand smells like a flopped set?
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 12-22-2005, 02:50 AM
Clarkmeister Clarkmeister is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 4,247
Default Re: TT vs.a small army of coldcallers

[ QUOTE ]
Betting the river here would not be a Clarkmeister.

You need to have been the aggressor on the previous street.

[/ QUOTE ]

No. Previous action is irrelevant.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 12-22-2005, 02:51 AM
Clarkmeister Clarkmeister is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 4,247
Default Re: TT vs.a small army of coldcallers

Bet/folding the turn is really bad IMO.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 12-22-2005, 03:42 AM
Jake (The Snake) Jake (The Snake) is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 93
Default Re: TT vs.a small army of coldcallers

Hmm... shows how much I know.

I could have sworn that having the lead on the previous street was a requirement, at least I'm pretty sure that is what has been preached in the forum for as long as I can remember.

I seem to remember Jason responding in a recent post that that was a requirement. Here it is.

Can anybody explain the requirements to me? I've also noticed a number of threads recently in MUSH I think that have questioned the value of the theory.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 12-22-2005, 03:58 AM
Jake (The Snake) Jake (The Snake) is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 93
Default Re: TT vs.a small army of coldcallers

After looking through a bunch of previous posts on the subject, it seems like there is no consensus and a lot of confusion. Having the lead on the previous street is mentioned as a requirement sometimes, and sometimes it is not. There's also a lot of disagreement about other facets of the play. Interesting.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:53 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.