#11
|
|||
|
|||
Re: TT vs.a small army of coldcallers
If you bet/fold the turn. what do you do on the river if he just calls your turn bet???
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Re: TT vs.a small army of coldcallers
Preflop and flop are perfect.
Turn I would bet/ fold to raise. River im check/calling if I get there. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Re: TT vs.a small army of coldcallers
Betting the river here would not be a Clarkmeister.
You need to have been the aggressor on the previous street. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Re: TT vs.a small army of coldcallers
[ QUOTE ]
For those who like bet/folding the turn... Is there any fear of a free shodown raise? Or a semibluff raise with (for instance) a nine and a club? Like I said, the villain didn't seem particularly tricky, but I think these are things any good TAG will do at least once in a while. [/ QUOTE ] While I don't really agree that raising with those types of hands would be correct, I do see TAG's doing those kinds of plays all the time and I certainly think bet/call should be an option on the turn against some opponents. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Re: TT vs.a small army of coldcallers
[ QUOTE ]
check/call the river . . . you are probably going to lose (if he bets) but you are getting 13:1 on the river call so I'd take the risk [/ QUOTE ] On the turn you can save a bb by folding to a raise (assuming we don't know the K [img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] is coming) . . . however after we bet if he calls . . . check/call will still be a good play 13:1 on the T high flush river |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Re: TT vs.a small army of coldcallers
Does anyone else think that the Button's hand smells like a flopped set?
|
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Re: TT vs.a small army of coldcallers
[ QUOTE ]
Betting the river here would not be a Clarkmeister. You need to have been the aggressor on the previous street. [/ QUOTE ] No. Previous action is irrelevant. |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Re: TT vs.a small army of coldcallers
Bet/folding the turn is really bad IMO.
|
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Re: TT vs.a small army of coldcallers
Hmm... shows how much I know.
I could have sworn that having the lead on the previous street was a requirement, at least I'm pretty sure that is what has been preached in the forum for as long as I can remember. I seem to remember Jason responding in a recent post that that was a requirement. Here it is. Can anybody explain the requirements to me? I've also noticed a number of threads recently in MUSH I think that have questioned the value of the theory. |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Re: TT vs.a small army of coldcallers
After looking through a bunch of previous posts on the subject, it seems like there is no consensus and a lot of confusion. Having the lead on the previous street is mentioned as a requirement sometimes, and sometimes it is not. There's also a lot of disagreement about other facets of the play. Interesting.
|
|
|