|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Re: AQs... I think I played it OK
[ QUOTE ]
River, I think the correct play vs sane opponents would be to check/fold unimproved. [/ QUOTE ] I don't think this is ever the right move... despite what read we have on our opponent. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: AQs... I think I played it OK
if your read told you that your opponent never 3bet the turn with just tptk, then i think you could make an excellent argument for folding river unimproved.....right.
but perhaps i was to quick to want to fold UI. my actual play would usually lead to a river cc, while I sometimes believe it should be a c/f. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: AQs... I think I played it OK
[ QUOTE ]
if your read told you that your opponent never 3bet the turn with just tptk, then i think you could make an excellent argument for folding river unimproved.....right. [/ QUOTE ] This is exactly my point. Reads don't tell you that a player NEVER makes a certain move, but rather that it is UNLIKELY that he would make such a move. As such, I think it's a huge mistake to check/fold this river because of such a read. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: AQs... I think I played it OK
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] if your read told you that your opponent never 3bet the turn with just tptk, then i think you could make an excellent argument for folding river unimproved.....right. [/ QUOTE ] This is exactly my point. Reads don't tell you that a player NEVER makes a certain move, but rather that it is UNLIKELY that he would make such a move. As such, I think it's a huge mistake to check/fold this river because of such a read. [/ QUOTE ] This is a good point, the read is not fool proof and some cards might make it worth it to payoff. Although, I think a K is a reasonable concern here - maybe a check/call is warrented for a 6-J? |
|
|