Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Limit Texas Hold'em > Small Stakes Shorthanded
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-18-2005, 11:06 PM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default River Confusion

MP is 60.6/3.3/.78 over 241 hands and has been getting some bad suckouts, including being vocal in the chatbox showing his disgust.

SB was 35.7/4.76/.85 over 42 hands, not a good read. I was not worried about the SB at all. I was more concerned with the MP because when he played, he usually had something worth playing.

Empire Poker 1/2 Hold'em (6 max, 5 handed) FTR converter on zerodivide.cx

Preflop: Hero is Button with J[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img], J[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img].
<font color="#666666">1 fold</font>, MP calls, <font color="#CC3333">Hero raises</font>, SB calls, <font color="#666666">1 fold</font>, MP calls.

Flop: (7 SB) K[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img], 4[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img], J[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(3 players)</font>
SB checks, MP checks, <font color="#CC3333">Hero bets</font>, SB calls, MP calls.

Turn: (5 BB) 3[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(3 players)</font>
SB checks, MP checks, <font color="#CC3333">Hero bets</font>, SB calls, MP calls.

River: (8 BB) 9[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(3 players)</font>
SB checks, MP checks, <font color="#CC3333">Hero bets</font>, SB calls, <font color="#CC3333">MP raises</font>, Hero calls, SB folds.

MP raise threw me off resulting in the call down. I couldn't figure out if there was any possible hand that he could beat me with since he showed weakness on the flop.

Final Pot: 13 BB
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-18-2005, 11:10 PM
Redd Redd is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 44
Default Re: River Confusion

Looks standard to me. I don't want to 3-bet a passive player who's obviously not bluffing a protected pot. I suspect you'll see K9/3/4 occasionally or J9 even more occasionally, but I think it's a legit flush often enough to just call.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-18-2005, 11:10 PM
Roy6 Roy6 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Europe
Posts: 381
Default Re: River Confusion

nm
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12-18-2005, 11:11 PM
Spicymoose Spicymoose is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 146
Default Re: River Confusion

[ QUOTE ]
MP raise threw me off resulting in the call down. I couldn't figure out if there was any possible hand that he could beat me with since he showed weakness on the flop.

[/ QUOTE ]

I am not exactly sure what you mean here. His play looks completely consistant with a flush draw that hit on the river. Calling is fine because you will win often enough, but raising is bad because you are not ahead 50% of the time (when he calls).

As for your reads...

[ QUOTE ]
MP is 60.6/3.3/.78 over 241 hands

[/ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I was more concerned with the MP because when he played, he usually had something worth playing.

[/ QUOTE ]

These two things don't line up. He is playing more than 60% of his hands, so when he plays, he can have almost any two cards.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 12-18-2005, 11:12 PM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: River Confusion

[ QUOTE ]
Looks standard to me. I don't want to 3-bet a passive player who's obviously not bluffing a protected pot. I suspect you'll see K9/3/4 occasionally or J9 even more occasionally, but I think it's a legit flush often enough to just call.

[/ QUOTE ]

I just started using PA recently. Could you tell me what tells you that he is passive?
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 12-18-2005, 11:15 PM
Spicymoose Spicymoose is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 146
Default Re: River Confusion

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Looks standard to me. I don't want to 3-bet a passive player who's obviously not bluffing a protected pot. I suspect you'll see K9/3/4 occasionally or J9 even more occasionally, but I think it's a legit flush often enough to just call.

[/ QUOTE ]

I just started using PA recently. Could you tell me what tells you that he is passive?

[/ QUOTE ]

In general, AG levels under 1.5 are pretty passive. If their VPIP is high (over 50), then under 1 is passive.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 12-18-2005, 11:22 PM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: River Confusion

[ QUOTE ]

As for your reads...

[ QUOTE ]
MP is 60.6/3.3/.78 over 241 hands

[/ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I was more concerned with the MP because when he played, he usually had something worth playing.

[/ QUOTE ]

These two things don't line up. He is playing more than 60% of his hands, so when he plays, he can have almost any two cards.

[/ QUOTE ]

That could have been (read, probably was) my misinterpretation of the reads. Also, could have been because he got me a few times when I least expected it. He has also been doing well more often than not on hands he had played.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:05 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.