Stars or Party ?

[jomatty]

its similar in my mind to the choice in cash games. i like stars software and tourny structure but party has the softest games on the net.
no reason to pick when you can play both though.
matty

[mbpoker]

>little or no heads up tournaments, don't recall shorthanded sit n go's at all, if they did offer maybe the fee seemed high...

When did you play on Stars last time? They have more heads-up tourneys than anyone and fees are lower not higher.

[HoldingFolding]

I've been playing MTTs on both for over a year and find the PP interface much easier to follow than PS.

[Oneiros]

I think I player PP more recently than Stars, I played stars last probably 1-1.5 years ago. Maybe i'll have to check out again... though I think I'm about to join a rake rebate type program (I won't mention which of course, recently saw a note about that) that will probably limit my selection, so it may depend on whether and how that works out. I'm a little dubious about it though as they claim their players are prop players for the online card rooms they handle, so while the rakeback's around 100%, it seems like it may be too good. We'll see.

Flame the guy's who are calling PS RiverStars, not the guy who's just trying to be helpful.

-SR