Playing vs. 'maniacs' - limit

[MNpoker]

If you don't mind me asking,

What makes it so you win live but not online?
- Perhaps the live players are worse (OK let's assume that). So online drop down to $3/6 then. Can you beat that game?
(Playing 4 $3/6 games on line will give you about the same win rate per hour as 30/60 live if your BB / hand is the same.)

there is no way anyone can convince me that the 3/6 game online is tougher than the 30/60 at Canterbury (Fall Classic or not).

Are there other reasons?
Just curious.

[mplspoker]

Well i don't know if you are serious or not, but multitabling as low as 5/10 on PP would generate substantially more $$/hour than anythng you could do at canterbury over the long run

[bicyclekick]

bob was just trying to be funny.

He wins plenty online...just not lately is why he's saying it.,

[dcarlc]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]


It tells me something when 'good' live players say they don't play on the internet for whatever reason. (Mainly that they can't be THAT good.)

[/ QUOTE ]

that's me.

[/ QUOTE ]

Must be why worm33 prefers live over online.