#1
|
|||
|
|||
ATs w/o pos -- lead out?
Should I have lead out on the F hoping that a higher kicker is raising here letting me fold safely on the T UI? I'm posting results so you understand where I'm coming from here. I think that either way I saved bets on this one [img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img]
Party Poker 1/2 Hold'em (9 max, 9 handed) converter Preflop: Hero is BB with T[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img], A[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img]. CO posts a blind of $1. <font color="#666666">1 fold</font>, UTG+1 calls, <font color="#666666">1 fold</font>, MP2 calls, MP3 calls, <font color="#CC3333">CO (poster) raises</font>, Button calls, <font color="#666666">1 fold</font>, Hero calls, UTG+1 calls, MP2 calls, MP3 calls. Flop: (12.50 SB) J[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img], 5[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img], A[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(6 players)</font> Hero checks, UTG+1 checks, MP2 checks, MP3 checks, CO checks, <font color="#CC3333">Button bets</font>, <font color="#CC3333">Hero raises</font>, UTG+1 calls, MP2 folds, MP3 folds, CO folds, Button calls. Turn: (9.25 BB) A[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(3 players)</font> <font color="#CC3333">Hero bets</font>, UTG+1 folds, Button calls. River: (11.25 BB) Q[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(2 players)</font> <font color="#CC3333">Hero bets</font>, Button calls. Final Pot: 13.25 BB Results in white below: <font color="#FFFFFF"> Hero has Tc Ac (three of a kind, aces). Button has Ah Kc (three of a kind, aces). Outcome: Button wins 13.25 BB. </font> |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: ATs w/o pos -- lead out?
Grunching
Lead the flop. By check raising the flop you blow away players who are likely to be behind and would call for one bet, but not for two. Try not to post results since it kills the discussion. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: ATs w/o pos -- lead out?
I only did so so that it would make sense why I'm worried about a higher kicker w/ AT -- Since the only one to raise PF folds, I have no reason otherwise to think so here -- leading out may have exposed the notoriously pre-flop-passive holder of AK/AQ/AJ.
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: ATs w/o pos -- lead out?
By leading out, you might have gotten a few calls to pad the pot and give you better odds at drawing for your ten.
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: ATs w/o pos -- lead out?
Standard, although I think you could have just bet out on the flop.
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: ATs w/o pos -- lead out?
Why do we not want to blow the other players out?
You played it fine. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: ATs w/o pos -- lead out?
[ QUOTE ]
By leading out, you might have gotten a few calls to pad the pot and give you better odds at drawing for your ten. [/ QUOTE ] How does he know he's behind on the flop? Even if he does betting out isn't going to accomplish much. Edit: [ QUOTE ] If the preflop raiser was in EP you could try for the check raise. Since it was CO who raised preflop I think you should just bet out on the flop. [/ QUOTE ] I think the opposite, I would rather bet out if the PFRer was in EP hoping he'll face the field calling 2 cold. You don't want to keep people around in a large multiway pot with TPGK. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: ATs w/o pos -- lead out?
I'd lead out in hopes to see if someone behind raises. Then you could gather some info on whether you are up against a better kicker or two pair or better. The check raise probably just scared the TPTK opponent into thinking you yourself hand better and simply called down.
I don't think the hand played as is was horrible or anything, however. Wally |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: ATs w/o pos -- lead out?
[ QUOTE ]
Lead the flop. By check raising the flop you blow away players who are likely to be behind and would call for one bet, but not for two. [/ QUOTE ] The pot is big. Your goal should be to maximize your chance of winning it. Not to build a bigger pot. [ QUOTE ] By leading out, you might have gotten a few calls to pad the pot and give you better odds at drawing for your ten. [/ QUOTE ] This is incorrect thinking. Betting to get more money in the pot so you can draw to something is not sound poker. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Re: ATs w/o pos -- lead out?
I think this play is definitely best -- I think I'm just crying because AK (to his detriment) never showed himself. There's no way I want this multi-way -- thinking through this if PFR'r was in EP -- I'd have to lead out, call the raise, and then call-down the whole way after the T ANYWAY... so I suppose my original question is a moot point in that either situation the results are the same -- even if CO DID raise how am I laying this down on any street (or do you begin to think AQ/AJ)?
|
|
|