|
|
#1
03-27-2005, 04:37 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Thinking at the Highest Level
You have 7 [img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] 5 [img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] in BB.
5/10 NL 6 handed on Party Villian is a very tight, multitabling regular who doesnt tilt and is above the competetion. He is on the Button. He respects your play. All fold to Button who raises to $320. SB folds. You push all-in. 
|
|
#4
03-27-2005, 05:17 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Thinking at the Highest Level
I'm confused as well. What kind of winning player open-raises for 32xBB? I really can't see that raise being a good one no matter what he has, unless he's been doing that regularly. And yes, I would fold...
|
|
#5
03-27-2005, 05:31 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Thinking at the Highest Level
A million monkeys, trying to write shakespear, probably produce more intelligent discourse on poker on each and every draft than this garbage.
|
|
#6
03-27-2005, 05:34 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Thinking at the Highest Level
[ QUOTE ]
A million monkeys, trying to write shakespear, probably produce more intelligent discourse on poker on each and every draft than this garbage. [/ QUOTE ] heads up for 5K?
|
|
#8
03-27-2005, 05:35 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Thinking at the Highest Level
[ QUOTE ]
I'm confused as well. What kind of winning player open-raises for 32xBB? I really can't see that raise being a good one no matter what he has, unless he's been doing that regularly. And yes, I would fold... [/ QUOTE ] Ive never seen him open raise for more then $40-50 in this game.
|
|
#9
03-27-2005, 05:38 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Thinking at the Highest Level
[ QUOTE ]
Wow. This is obviously too high of a level for me. I don't get it [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img] Your post makes no sense. [/ QUOTE ] instead of trying to be witty and sarcastic, take a second to analyze the hand. lets start: what do you think villian has? why did he bet that amount? pretend youre a poker player or a detective....
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
