Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Limit Texas Hold'em > Mid- and High-Stakes Hold'em
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 07-22-2005, 04:33 AM
The Truth The Truth is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 207
Default check/call check/call lead

lag raises utg +1, folded to me in BB I call with KQo

flop comes kd 6s 5s
hero checks, lag bets, hero calls

turn 2d
hero checks, lag bets, hero calls

river 3d
hero bets, lag raises, hero calls.

what ya think?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 07-22-2005, 05:47 AM
Kovner Kovner is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 4
Default Re: check/call check/call lead

I like checkraising the turn here, unless you think he'll fold a lot of hands to a turn checkraise.
If he calls you down after a turn checkraise, the value is the same as your line. But, if he just calls (or folds) to your sudden river betout, cring the turn is better.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 07-22-2005, 06:05 AM
BlindingLaser BlindingLaser is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 9
Default Re: check/call check/call lead

I like a flop check-raise against a LAG, since the only hands you're reasonably behind here are AK, AA, and KK, and KK is pretty unlikely. You don't want to risk him checking behind on the turn, you have a lot of equity against his range, if he's really aggressive he might put in a third bet while behind, and he's not folding for a small bet even with a hand like AQ where he's drawing to three outs.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 07-22-2005, 06:51 AM
Kovner Kovner is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 4
Default Re: check/call check/call lead

[ QUOTE ]
I like a flop check-raise against a LAG, since the only hands you're reasonably behind here are AK, AA, and KK, and KK is pretty unlikely. You don't want to risk him checking behind on the turn, you have a lot of equity against his range, if he's really aggressive he might put in a third bet while behind, and he's not folding for a small bet even with a hand like AQ where he's drawing to three outs.

[/ QUOTE ]

I assumed an implication of "he's a LAG" is that he'd rarely check behind on the turn. Why is checkraising the flop better than checkraising the turn, then?
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 07-22-2005, 09:37 AM
BlindingLaser BlindingLaser is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 9
Default Re: check/call check/call lead

The reason I like obtaining the lead here is because of the spades on board, I'd like my opponent to not check through A8s, for instance, because he has 12 outs. He'll call down, and he might even call a bet with A high or a pair of 8s on the river, but giving a free card here is more dangerous than on a board of K82r.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 07-22-2005, 12:48 PM
Xhiggy Xhiggy is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 26
Default Re: check/call check/call lead

A LAG is definitely not checking behind on the turn with Axs, heck, even I'm not checking behind on the turn with it. the only debate, in my opinion, is whether you gain more by letting the LAG continuation-bet his hand to death, or to check-raise on some street and hope to get called down by a weaker hand. Against a LAG, I actually prefer 3-betting PF. And yes, I do prefer check-raising the turn here, as he'll call down with a lot and I don't think he can easily 3-bet you without a much better hand, as you could conceivably have 34, but you never know..
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:17 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.