|
|
|
|
#1
12-19-2005, 07:25 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Self-Defense, an answer to guns v. knives debate
Well, a hand-axe only does 1d6 damage, and most NPCs have at least 8 hit points. It is a slight improvement over a dagger, at 1d4. I'd go for a pole-axe, it does 1d12. Can't really hide it under your pillow, though.
|
|
#2
12-19-2005, 07:27 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Self-Defense, an answer to guns v. knives debate
[ QUOTE ]
Well, a hand-axe only does 1d6 damage, and most NPCs have at least 8 hit points. It is a slight improvement over a dagger, at 1d4. I'd go for a pole-axe, it does 1d12. Can't really hide it under your pillow, though. [/ QUOTE ] ROFL
|
|
#3
12-19-2005, 07:42 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Self-Defense, an answer to guns v. knives debate
[ QUOTE ]
Well, a hand-axe only does 1d6 damage, and most NPCs have at least 8 hit points. It is a slight improvement over a dagger, at 1d4. I'd go for a pole-axe, it does 1d12. Can't really hide it under your pillow, though. [/ QUOTE ] If you have a cleric with you, you can just melee him down and raise hand to hand.
|
 |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
