#11
|
|||
|
|||
Re: David Slansky Isn\'t That Good A Poker Writer
He wrote "Theory of Poker" and "Sklansky on Poker Theory" on different games, Stud, holdem, razz. I sense that you're joking right? Hard to read the tone in your post.
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Re: A Poll for Buiser
[ QUOTE ]
Which is better money spent? 2+2 book Star Wars Episode III: Revegne of the Sith [/ QUOTE ] Poker Essays III: Revenge of the River |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Re: David Slansky Isn\'t That Good A Poker Writer
bruiser,
skanskly wrote many of these ideas a long time. what is common sense to us as poker players today was not back then. he also introduced concepts such as the "semibluff" and a solid starting hand chart. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Re: David Slansky Isn\'t That Good A Poker Writer
Hi Brute:
[ QUOTE ] It is not hard to name better writers. ... mason ... [/ QUOTE ] I agree completely. best wishes, mason |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Re: David Slansky Isn\'t That Good A Poker Writer
You seem to have muddled your original opinion with this interesting follow-up post. I am not saying that I agree or disagree with said opinion. But you need to come up with better stuff than this:
[ QUOTE ] supersystem [/ QUOTE ] Uh, ok. Is that an author? [ QUOTE ] most posters on this site [/ QUOTE ] What percentage of the posters on this site would you stake to play in the party 30/60? [ QUOTE ] practically everyone. [/ QUOTE ] Is this everyone on earth? Sounds like a little bit of reductio ad absurdum to me. Did you forget to check-raise some rivers or something? |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Re: David Slansky Isn\'t That Good A Poker Writer
[ QUOTE ]
Hi Brute: [ QUOTE ] It is not hard to name better writers. ... mason ... [/ QUOTE ] I agree completely. best wishes, mason [/ QUOTE ] Congrats, that was awesome. |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Re: David Slansky Isn\'t That Good A Poker Writer
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] supersystem [/ QUOTE ] Uh, ok. Is that an author? [/ QUOTE ] Yeah, good point, retard. Obviously I am talking about Doyle Brunson here. [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] most posters on this site [/ QUOTE ] What percentage of the posters on this site would you stake to play in the party 30/60? [/ QUOTE ] Hyperbole, I am talking about most of the good/best posters. [/ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] practically everyone. [/ QUOTE ] Is this everyone on earth? [/ QUOTE ] STFU [ QUOTE ] Sounds like a little bit of reductio ad absurdum to me. Did you forget to check-raise some rivers or something? [/ QUOTE ] I am not saying he isn't a good writer, I read his books a couple times each, but his stuff is kind of mundane and nothing special. |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Re: David Slansky Isn\'t That Good A Poker Writer
[ QUOTE ]
Yeah, good point, retard. Obviously I am talking about Doyle Brunson here. [/ QUOTE ] And we all know Doyle was the only writer in Super System. |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Re: David Slansky Isn\'t That Good A Poker Writer
[ QUOTE ]
Obviously I am talking about Doyle Brunson here. [/ QUOTE ] You're kidding, right? Also, Sklansky wrote a chapter. T |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Re: David Slansky Isn\'t A Good Poker Writer
A while ago DS wrote that he had not had much experience playing no-limit poker, because of lack of nl-games during the last 20 years. I'm just wondering how he can have a book about nl comming out if he has not played it much????
|
|
|