Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Internet Gambling > Internet Gambling
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-15-2005, 03:04 AM
Posty123 Posty123 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 21
Default Roy Cooke article in Card Player is wrong.

His main point being that internet hold 'em ring games require a 50% larger bankroll than live play.

No tipping and no jackpot drop unless desired should not increase but decrease bankroll requirements.

I've played probably 500,000 hands of online poker from $1-$2 to $5-$10 and have not deviated down more than 150 BB at any point.

I believe that bank roll requirement are much less for online winning players.

He usually has such good advice. I was surprised to see such an inaccurate assesment.

Comments?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-15-2005, 03:13 AM
Seether Seether is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 85
Default Re: Roy Cooke article in Card Player is wrong.

It has nothing to do with the rake and tipping and everything to do with the difference in aggression and quality of play at the differing levels.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-15-2005, 03:16 AM
Posty123 Posty123 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 21
Default Re: Roy Cooke article in Card Player is wrong.

Tipping and jack pot drop have to increase variance. That's just a fact.

Especially at the $1-$2 to $5-10 level.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-15-2005, 03:28 AM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Roy Cooke article in Card Player is wrong.

[ QUOTE ]
Tipping and jack pot drop have to increase variance. That's just a fact.


[/ QUOTE ] Bankroll amount for a given risk is a function of advantage, dispersion and bet amount. So if your advantage is sufficiently less online for any level (and that seems to be general agreement) then original statement makes perfect sense.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-15-2005, 02:11 PM
DarkKnight DarkKnight is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 265
Default Re: Roy Cooke article in Card Player is wrong.

[ QUOTE ]
Tipping and jack pot drop have to increase variance. That's just a fact.

Especially at the $1-$2 to $5-10 level.

[/ QUOTE ]

Actually they decrease winrate (if you include the toke - and the extra drop) varience shouldn't change much if at all
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 11-16-2005, 08:40 AM
Theodore Donald Kiravatsos Theodore Donald Kiravatsos is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: This goes to eleven.
Posts: 142
Default Re: Roy Cooke article in Card Player is wrong.

[ QUOTE ]
Tipping and jack pot drop have to increase variance. That's just a fact.

Especially at the $1-$2 to $5-10 level.

[/ QUOTE ]

This is the first time ever for me to say the magic words...

As rake increases from the normal, to the high, to the unfair, to the unrealistic, to the insanely high (picture a 1-2 game with a million dollar rake no matter the pot size, and a "no flop-no drop" rule in effect), increasing the rake will DECREASE your variance.

"Do you see why?"
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 11-16-2005, 01:31 PM
punter11235 punter11235 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Poland
Posts: 198
Default Re: Roy Cooke article in Card Player is wrong.

[ QUOTE ]
Tipping and jack pot drop have to increase variance. That's just a fact.


[/ QUOTE ]

LOL. Not if youre giving the tips of the same size in the same situations but if you get fancy and for example give no tips sometimes but tipping huge other days and do it at random then yes, variance will increase
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 11-15-2005, 03:15 AM
augie00 augie00 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 1
Default Re: Roy Cooke article in Card Player is wrong.

[ QUOTE ]
I've played probably 500,000 hands of online poker from $1-$2 to $5-$10 and have not deviated down more than 150 BB at any point.

[/ QUOTE ]

damn. you must be the best poker player on earth. geez. i would like to stake you for 20/40. i'll have to sell my car but it will be worth it.

seriously, man. i know some damn talented LHE players and they have ALL swung down 500 bets or more at one point in time. 500k hands? are you sure?
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 11-15-2005, 03:23 AM
Posty123 Posty123 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 21
Default Re: Roy Cooke article in Card Player is wrong.

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I've played probably 500,000 hands of online poker from $1-$2 to $5-$10 and have not deviated down more than 150 BB at any point.

[/ QUOTE ]

damn. you must be the best poker player on earth. geez. i would like to stake you for 20/40. i'll have to sell my car but it will be worth it.

seriously, man. i know some damn talented LHE players and they have ALL swung down 500 bets or more at one point in time. 500k hands? are you sure?

[/ QUOTE ]

12% VPIP 30% WTSD 3 AF
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 11-15-2005, 04:05 AM
SoCalRugger SoCalRugger is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 2
Default Re: Roy Cooke article in Card Player is wrong.

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I've played probably 500,000 hands of online poker from $1-$2 to $5-$10 and have not deviated down more than 150 BB at any point.

[/ QUOTE ]

damn. you must be the best poker player on earth. geez. i would like to stake you for 20/40. i'll have to sell my car but it will be worth it.

seriously, man. i know some damn talented LHE players and they have ALL swung down 500 bets or more at one point in time. 500k hands? are you sure?

[/ QUOTE ]

12% VPIP 30% WTSD 3 AF

[/ QUOTE ]

See that augie? He really is the best poker player on earth. Man, did he show you...
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:29 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.