Real life moral dilemna

[JonPKibble]

[ QUOTE ]
Remember, he has already committed a crime just by talking to her, just by picking up the phone.

[/ QUOTE ]

Link please?

I think the "magic medicine" dilemmas were more "real life" than your example.

[DarrenX]

[ QUOTE ]
I said yes because there might be some manic crazy sex for going over. Crazy girl sex is worth the risk, and it's not even close. Those who know what I mean know what I mean.

[/ QUOTE ]

Yeah, it's right up there with makeup sex and conjugal visit sex. NICE... [img]/images/graemlins/smirk.gif[/img]

[PLOlover]

http://www.menweb.org/youngres.htm

[ QUOTE ]
Legally, it doesn't matter if the contact is accidental, or if it happened with the purported victim's consent or at her initiative.

[/ QUOTE ]

[PLOlover]

[ QUOTE ]
Also there are different way to break a restraining order, e.g. talking isn't as bad as visiting, her calling you isn't as bad as you calling her etc. He would probably be off with a warning and not serious charge.


[/ QUOTE ]

Mandatory arrest in some jurisdictions, and also mandatory prosecution.

This guy called wife from hospital during heart attack while he was doped up on morphine

[benkahuna]

This is retarded and totally implausible.

Even if I believe you, I choose option C, have a friend call the cops and send them to her place. Duh. Ever heard of an anonymous tip?

And whenever people are involved, the law is not as pedantic as you've described.

If this situation were really this hardcore, the guy wouldn't have answered the phone and if he did, he deserved whatever bad things occurred. He would have been stupid to answer and he would reap the consequences for doing so. Being stupid has consequences though it seems people choose not to accept it. Stupid to me is doing something with serious consequences when you know better than to do so.


And the other poster was right, just going over there is a good idea for "I know what you mean."

[PLOlover]

This one is funny

Caller ID.