Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > General Poker Discussion > Poker Theory
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #1  
Old 07-18-2005, 01:49 PM
TGoldman TGoldman is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Bellevue, WA
Posts: 15
Default Betting Structure Theory

I've been thinking about various poker games and the different betting structures for each game. Specifically three main types of betting structures:

1) Limit
2) Pot-Limit
3) No-Limit

Is there a fundamental aspect of a generic poker game that makes it more conducive to be played using a particular betting structure? For example, Omaha high is usually played using a Pot-Limit betting structure. From my understanding, most players consider limit Omaha high to be boring and tedious. The reverse is true for Pot-Limit Omaha/8. This game is rarely played outside of the internet and most PLO/8 authors admit that the Pot-Limit betting structure results in a dying game. As a result, limit Omaha/8 is the main betting structure for the game. What accounts for this difference? Also, what about Omaha makes it difficult to be played using the No-Limit structure? Why is a game like Hold'em able to be played using all three different betting structures? I'm wondering if there is some general concept that governs the best choice of betting structure for a particular poker game?
Reply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:13 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.