Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Limit Texas Hold'em > Small Stakes Shorthanded
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-21-2005, 07:31 AM
wheelz wheelz is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: London, Ontario, Canda
Posts: 163
Default an unknown uses a confusing line part 1

both players are unknown, it's my first orbit. have to call down?

Party Poker 15/30 Hold'em (6 max, 6 handed) converter

Preflop: Hero is UTG with 8[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img], 8[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img].
<font color="#CC3333">Hero raises</font>, <font color="#666666">1 fold</font>, <font color="#CC3333">CO 3-bets</font>, Button calls, <font color="#666666">2 folds</font>, Hero calls.

Flop: (10.66 SB) 7[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img], 9[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img], 9[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(3 players)</font>
Hero checks, CO checks, Button checks.

Turn: (5.33 BB) 7[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(3 players)</font>
<font color="#CC3333">Hero bets</font>, <font color="#CC3333">CO raises</font>, Button calls, Hero ?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 09-21-2005, 07:44 AM
krishanleong krishanleong is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 45
Default Re: an unknown uses a confusing line part 1

I think fold is the right play. It doesn't make you feel good, but I think it's the right play.

Krishan
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 09-21-2005, 07:48 AM
TMFS9 TMFS9 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 22
Default Re: an unknown uses a confusing line part 1

I figured that was you at the table, i don't recall this hand but in that game I can't fold it, what opponent was it?
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 09-21-2005, 08:00 AM
wheelz wheelz is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: London, Ontario, Canda
Posts: 163
Default Re: an unknown uses a confusing line part 1

ACEHEARTTT
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 09-21-2005, 08:02 AM
spydog spydog is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 7
Default Re: an unknown uses a confusing line part 1

I'm calling this down if button hadn't coldcalled 2. Since he did, I think I can fold this.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 09-21-2005, 08:06 AM
wheelz wheelz is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: London, Ontario, Canda
Posts: 163
Default Re: an unknown uses a confusing line part 1

what if the only hand you've seen the button play is this: utg raises, folded to mp who 3 bets, he calls in the sb with A[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] 2[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img]. does that change things?
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 09-21-2005, 08:16 AM
spydog spydog is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 7
Default Re: an unknown uses a confusing line part 1

[ QUOTE ]
what if the only hand you've seen the button play is this: utg raises, folded to mp who 3 bets, he calls in the sb with A[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] 2[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img]. does that change things?

[/ QUOTE ]

Yep. I'm probably calling down both of them.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 09-21-2005, 08:32 AM
cartman cartman is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 366
Default Re: an unknown uses a confusing line part 1

I would say CO has quads or an overpair about 75% here and a big Ace high probably with a flush draw the other 25%. Who knows what button has but a monster waiting until the river is certainly a possibility. Maybe it is different in the higher games, but at 5/10 and from what I have read in the archives about 10/20 CO's flop check is an almost guaranteed monster. That said I think your only choices on the turn are bet and fold to a raise and check-call. I remember a post I think by gonores where he commented basically that he would check-fold anything less than top pair top kicker on the turn after a preflop 3-bettor checked the flop and that he wouldn't bet unless he had at least two pair.

Cartman
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 09-21-2005, 08:40 AM
spydog spydog is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 7
Default Re: an unknown uses a confusing line part 1

[ QUOTE ]
I would say CO has quads or an overpair about 75% here and a big Ace high probably with a flush draw the other 25%. Who knows what button has but a monster waiting until the river is certainly a possibility. Maybe it is different in the higher games, but at 5/10 and from what I have read in the archives about 10/20 CO's flop check is an almost guaranteed monster. That said I think your only choices on the turn are bet and fold to a raise and check-call. I remember a post I think by gonores where he commented basically that he would check-fold anything less than top pair top kicker on the turn after a preflop 3-bettor checked the flop and that he wouldn't bet unless he had at least two pair.

Cartman

[/ QUOTE ]

You make some good points. This does appear to be a pretty standard 'monster line'.

I've changed my mind back to fold. Sorry, Wheelz.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 09-21-2005, 08:42 AM
wheelz wheelz is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: London, Ontario, Canda
Posts: 163
Default Re: an unknown uses a confusing line part 1

Good points, I should've thought more about what to do if I got raised before it happened... I think either bet-fold or check-call is better than bet-call.

About the preflop aggressor checking the flop though, I'm just not so sure these days. I think back when gonores was posting here it was almost common wisdom that the preflop aggressor checking behind on the flop meant he had a big hand, but nowadays I see a hand that missed the flop far more often. Maybe it's just me, but I've found that the majority of online shorthanded players at these limits really are making continuation bets with almost all of their hands; they know better than to check when they actually hit a flop. That's the majority of them, and IMO. So it's certainly not out of the question that it's a monster, but I'm gonna go out on a limb and say nowadays it's a missed hand more often.

The turn raise this hand seems to suggest the opposite, but that's irrelevant.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:53 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.