Guys who go to tanning salons

[Luv2DriveTT]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I use a nail file and do my own nails

[/ QUOTE ]

i bleach my a$shole

[/ QUOTE ]

Dam, I'm impressed!

TT [img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img]

[YourFoxyGrandma]

I once knew a dude whos girlfriend made him go tanning with her. I also didn't like him very much.

I think it used to be most common in Jersey, but somehow it is spreading. I'm not for or against it, in fact, I've often thought it would be nice. I'm kind of white and irish, and it would be great to have tan. Then, I think about the process of going to a tanning salon, feeling ridiclous at the tanning salon, and then explaining to people that I went to a tanning salon and it's about that point that I decide it was a stupid thought to begin with. This is coming from somebody that goes to a high-end salon for a hair cut and is more than willing to pay for it...the tanning thing just weirds me out a little.

I also already have a girl that digs me, as it seems most of the posters are using "it gets me chicks" for their reasoning.

[Alex/Mugaaz]

Its only allowed if you do it at the gym.

[cnfuzzd]

[ QUOTE ]
Do any straight guys do this? I mean, outside of guys in Jersey.

[/ QUOTE ]

El Diablo,

I couldn't agree more. A girlfriend one time told me i *had* to go tanning with her. I made it about five minutes in the "bed" before i got out, re=clothed, and went outside to smoke a cigarette. We had a long discussion about the things we would be doing "as a couple".

peace

john nickle

[Sephus]

[ QUOTE ]
Having your nails done & tanning does not make you a metro, I don't do either yet I still think I am the true defininition of a metro.

[/ QUOTE ]

TT, the second clause supports the statment "not all metros have their nails done/go tanning," not the statment "not all those who have their nails done/go tanning are metros."

just because it's not the case that all metros have their nails done and go to tanning salons does not mean that it's not the case that all men who have their nails done and go to tanning salons are metros.

please dont make me draw you a venn diagram.

[Luv2DriveTT]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Having your nails done & tanning does not make you a metro, I don't do either yet I still think I am the true defininition of a metro.

[/ QUOTE ]

TT, the second clause supports the statment "not all metros have their nails done/go tanning," not the statment "not all those who have their nails done/go tanning are metros."

just because it's not the case that all metros have their nails done and go to tanning salons does not mean that it's not the case that all men who have their nails done and go to tanning salons are metros.

please dont make me draw you a venn diagram.

[/ QUOTE ]

Venn away...

TT [img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img]

[Sephus]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Having your nails done & tanning does not make you a metro, I don't do either yet I still think I am the true defininition of a metro.

[/ QUOTE ]

TT, the second clause supports the statment "not all metros have their nails done/go tanning," not the statment "not all those who have their nails done/go tanning are metros."

just because it's not the case that all metros have their nails done and go to tanning salons does not mean that it's not the case that all men who have their nails done and go to tanning salons are metros.

please dont make me draw you a venn diagram.

[/ QUOTE ]

Venn away...

TT [img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img]

[/ QUOTE ]

cmon don't ask if youre not serious.

i define set A as all metrosexuals, and set B as all people who go tanning and get their nails done.

someone suggests that B is a subset of A: "having your nails done & tanning makes you a metro."

you reply: no, B is not a subset of A, because i am not a member of B yet i am a member of A. "i don't do either yet I still think I am the true defininition of a metro."

but the fact that A has members that are not in B (like you) says nothing about whether B has members that are not in A. if B and A are not the same and B is in fact a subset of A, there HAVE to be members of A but not B (like you), so your point is actually no counterevidence at all.

[BottlesOf]

Worse than wearing beaters.

[Eurotrash]

These responses boggle my mind, rly.

tanning is not comparable to a haircut. it's comparable to eating some guy's ass out while you're getting your hair cut.