Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Other Topics > Politics
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-21-2005, 09:53 AM
superleeds superleeds is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 309
Default Re: NYC transit strike

[ QUOTE ]
The *real* blame, of course, lies with government. Government decided to put all the eggs in one basket and have a monopoly transit system. By eliminating any alternatives, the city put itself into a position to be blackmailed by the transit workers

[/ QUOTE ]

And who would operate all the unprofitable routes? at the unprofitable times?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-21-2005, 10:33 AM
tylerdurden tylerdurden is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: actually pvn
Posts: 0
Default Re: NYC transit strike

[ QUOTE ]
And who would operate all the unprofitable routes? at the unprofitable times?

[/ QUOTE ]

Nobody, presumably. Is that a problem? Do unprofitable riders have a right to make others subsidize their travel?
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-21-2005, 10:58 AM
BluffTHIS! BluffTHIS! is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 375
Default Re: NYC transit strike

Yeah and stop delivering the mail to remote areas of the US too. Then Ray Zee would just be SOL. Government exists to promote the common good, though it should do it as cheaply as possible.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12-21-2005, 11:04 AM
tylerdurden tylerdurden is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: actually pvn
Posts: 0
Default Re: NYC transit strike

[ QUOTE ]
Yeah and stop delivering the mail to remote areas of the US too. Then Ray Zee would just be SOL. Government exists to promote the common good, though it should do it as cheaply as possible.

[/ QUOTE ]

FedEx seems to be able to profitably deliver packages to "remote areas". I don't really see a problem here. Is package delievery to the yukon some sort of basic human right that I'm supposed to pay for?
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 12-21-2005, 11:10 AM
superleeds superleeds is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 309
Default Re: NYC transit strike

[ QUOTE ]
FedEx seems to be able to profitably deliver packages to "remote areas".

[/ QUOTE ]

I think you'll find that even FedEx has 'loss leaders'
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 12-21-2005, 11:23 AM
tylerdurden tylerdurden is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: actually pvn
Posts: 0
Default Re: NYC transit strike

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
FedEx seems to be able to profitably deliver packages to "remote areas".

[/ QUOTE ]

I think you'll find that even FedEx has 'loss leaders'

[/ QUOTE ]

Probably. Is this somehow *helping* your argument?
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 12-21-2005, 11:40 AM
superleeds superleeds is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 309
Default Re: NYC transit strike

[ QUOTE ]
Probably. Is this somehow *helping* your argument?

[/ QUOTE ]

No. But it wasn't meant to. I'm just pointing out an inconsistancy as earlier you said

[ QUOTE ]
FedEx seems to be able to profitably deliver packages to "remote areas". I don't really see a problem here. Is package delievery to the yukon some sort of basic human right that I'm supposed to pay for?

[/ QUOTE ]

So quite *probably* you do accept that you are 'overcharged' by FedEx on their more profitable routes to compensate for their unprofitable ones.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 12-21-2005, 11:11 AM
superleeds superleeds is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 309
Default Re: NYC transit strike

Ah, LA's answer to public transport
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:28 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.