Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Limit Texas Hold'em > Micro-Limits
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-11-2005, 12:51 AM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Top two pair c/r\'ed on the turn. . .

Okay, I've been trying to clear the bonus at casino.net, and they have a terrible hand history system, so I'm going to have to do this on my own. Here we go:

Table is typical loose-passive. Unfortunately, I don't think Poker Tracker works at casino.net, and I was multi-tabling; my reads weren't very good. In general, button was weak-tight, CO was a calling station, and the blinds were new to the table (less than 15 hands each).

Casino.net .50/1 limit:

Hero is UTG with K [img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img]Q [img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img].

Preflop:
Hero calls, 5 folds, CO calls, button calls, sb completes, bb checks.

Flop (5 handed, 5 small bets): K [img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] 10 [img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] Q [img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img]
Sb checks, bb checks, Hero bets, CO calls, button calls, sb folds, bb calls.

Turn (4 hands, 4.5 big bets): 8 [img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img]
Sb checks, bb checks, Hero bets, CO calls, button folds, bb raises, Hero ????
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-11-2005, 01:03 AM
Eeegah Eeegah is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Raising 99 and flopping quads
Posts: 609
Default Re: Top two pair c/r\'ed on the turn. . .

KQo is juuuust at the bottom of my raising range UTG, but I don't hate a limp. The next 30 posts will be people who think limping is a horrible mistake.

You're obviously going to showdown here, and while he may be slowplaying a straight , made 2 pair, or 88 just hit a set. I'll put BB on a range of
88, AJ, KT, K8, QT, Q8, J9, T8, even though AJ might raise PF. You're soundly ahead of this range, 62%-38%. I say 3-bet.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-11-2005, 04:00 AM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Top two pair c/r\'ed on the turn. . .

Limping is a horrible mistake.

3-bet the turn. He most likely hit his two-pair
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12-11-2005, 04:06 AM
McGahee McGahee is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 735
Default Re: Top two pair c/r\'ed on the turn. . .

[ QUOTE ]
KQo is juuuust at the bottom of my raising range UTG, but I don't hate a limp. The next 30 posts will be people who think limping is a horrible mistake.


[/ QUOTE ]

Yeah but it's so much easier to play postflop! Huge mistake! OMG the sky is falling! It's almost as terrible as raising 3 limpers with QJs from the SB!

Yeah, I 3-bet with the intention of not getting capped and subsequently throwing up in my mouth.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 12-11-2005, 04:12 AM
LoaferGee12 LoaferGee12 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Dreading my first downswing
Posts: 478
Default Re: Top two pair c/r\'ed on the turn. . .

[ QUOTE ]
KQo is juuuust at the bottom of my raising range UTG, but I don't hate a limp. The next 30 posts will be people who think limping is a horrible mistake.

You're obviously going to showdown here, and while he may be slowplaying a straight , made 2 pair, or 88 just hit a set. I'll put BB on a range of
88, AJ, KT, K8, QT, Q8, J9, T8, even though AJ might raise PF. You're soundly ahead of this range, 62%-38%. I say 3-bet.

[/ QUOTE ]

I dunno I think a weak, Q-hi 2-pair just goes ahead and bets this turn. This play resembles more of a monster (straight or set). If this was a straight up raise (not a check-raise), I'm 3-betting this everytime. However, since it isn't, I think we may be behind here a bit much and we also want to keep CO in.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 12-11-2005, 07:00 AM
ajm36 ajm36 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 18
Default Re: Top two pair c/r\'ed on the turn. . .

I used to limp this PF from EP, but now I raise it--eventually you will too, but KQ will not be a losing hand if you don't. I 3-bet the turn and then punch my testicles when it gets capped (but throwing up in your mouth or peeing yourself is fine). If capped call down. If called, bet the riv.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 12-11-2005, 07:12 AM
Shillx Shillx is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Frog and Peach Pub, Downtown SLO
Posts: 4,478
Default Re: Top two pair c/r\'ed on the turn. . .

Wow limping is a horrible mistake.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 12-11-2005, 12:57 PM
Eeegah Eeegah is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Raising 99 and flopping quads
Posts: 609
Default Re: Top two pair c/r\'ed on the turn. . .

That's five, only 25 more replies to go!
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 12-11-2005, 02:02 PM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Top two pair c/r\'ed on the turn. . .

For me, pf KQ off is a 51% raise, 49% call with few reads, so I think limping here is OK. Bet the flop 100% of the time. Scary board for top 2. You need to see where you are quickly.

So the BB c/r you? He played any 2 here, which is another reason for raising your hand pf, although I doubt most fish will fold a hand like J9 from the BB.

What to do here? I lean towards raising to isolate the BB. The rest of the field wil have to call at least 2 & maybe 3 if BB caps. If he does, I call the cap bet.

On the riv, I bet if I catch a K or Q OR if there was no cap on the turn. Otherwise, I call the BB's bet.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 12-11-2005, 03:02 PM
benkath1 benkath1 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 13
Default Re: Top two pair c/r\'ed on the turn. . .

[ QUOTE ]
Wow limping is a horrible mistake.

[/ QUOTE ]

Could you elaborate on this more? This is one of my EP trouble hands. Especially at lower limits against unknowns.

I'm 50/50 on raising KQo utg.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:57 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.