|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Is panspermia a scienctific theory?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] I'm pleased to see support for my earlier insistance that panspermia is a scientific theory (in contrast to ID) in the fact that a summary of the status of this theory is in the current edition of "Scientific American". [/ QUOTE ] Ha, knew it. I've come to the conclusion that any explanation for anything, so long as God isn't involved, can be made scientific, even FSM. [/ QUOTE ] LOL. But some God based hypotheses are testable as scientific theories. And what is FSM?..that one is lost on me. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Is panspermia a scienctific theory?
[ QUOTE ]
And what is FSM?..that one is lost on me. [/ QUOTE ] Flying Spaghetti Monster. As in SETI, if you haven't found him yet, keep looking - the fact he hasn't shown up doesn't mean he isn't there. Now that's real science. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Is panspermia a scienctific theory?
Who's calling FSM real science?
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Is panspermia a scienctific theory?
[ QUOTE ]
Who's calling FSM real science? [/ QUOTE ] I sometimes cave to the sarcasm temptation. |
|
|