|
|
|
|
#3
12-20-2005, 10:58 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Beauty is only skin deep....
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] there is no excuse for a 37% W$SD unless all the rivers were checked. [/ QUOTE ] [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img] [/ QUOTE ] Somebody care to explain this??? 
|
|
#4
12-20-2005, 11:17 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Beauty is only skin deep....
My won $ at show down numbers are a lot lower in pot limit than in limit because frequently a river will get checked through when several people miss a draw...especially when the pot is small and people don't want to risk a bet to win a small pot.
So, the river gets checked through. Your W$SD percentages go down. Had there been a bet on the river, you most likely would have folded...which would have resulted in your W$SD number not going down. Dave
|
|
#5
12-20-2005, 11:18 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Beauty is only skin deep....
Someone confused Went to Showdown (WtSD%) with Won $ at Showdown (W$SD)
|
|
#6
12-20-2005, 11:22 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Beauty is only skin deep....
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] there is no excuse for a 37% W$SD unless all the rivers were checked. [/ QUOTE ] [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img] [/ QUOTE ] Somebody care to explain this??? [/ QUOTE ] I'm going to assume that he mistyped fish 1's 34.78 W$SD. Not entirely sure what his point is though... Still, that's a rediculously bad table, and me just venting about a really horrid session.
|
 |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
