Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Internet Gambling > Internet Gambling
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #41  
Old 01-05-2005, 07:23 PM
Derek in NYC Derek in NYC is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 130
Default Another way of thinking about rake

Or think about rake differently. Party Poker is rumored to have grossed $500M last year. Let's suppose that in the course of a year, Party Poker has 600,000 active players.

This seems like a reasonable estimate since at any given time, let's say the average number of players on party poker is 25,000. If the average player plays 1 time per day, and the average poker session is 1 hour long, in order to maintain a constant 25,000 players online, you'd need a pool of 600,000 active players, each cycling through for 1 hour per day.

If you assume there are 600,000 players total paying $500M in rake annually, each player on average will pay about $833 per year in rake.

How many of you would happily pay $833 without having it having a material impact on your performance? I probably gross 10-15k annually from poker, so 833 is a real hit on my results.

Now add to this the fact that I am a winning player, but the losers must not only pay the rake, but also pay out in losses to winning players who multitable.

Online poker has the real potential for overfishing.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:32 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.