Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Limit Texas Hold'em > Small Stakes Shorthanded
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-16-2005, 12:14 PM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Multitabling....necessary?

I've been trying to play short-handed exclusively the past month, and it's going pretty well thanks to a pretty good run of cards. However, any time I try to add more than one table, things go down hill fast. I end up losing at both tables because the action's pretty fast, and the decisions are more marginal than in full ring games.

Now I can two and three table full ring pretty well. In fact, it gets boring not doing so some days.

My question is, how necessary is multitabling short handed? If I'm not comfortable with it, and lose money doing it, is it something I should push through? Should I continue to play one table for a while and hope I get more comfortable later?

Am I a clumsy, short-attention-span-having fish who is destined to one table for the rest of my days?

In a single question, did most of you single table until you were comfortable, or did you make yourself play more than one table?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-16-2005, 12:16 PM
Spicymoose Spicymoose is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 146
Default Re: Multitabling....necessary?

If you are a losing player, you should single-table, you will lose your money slower. If you are just barely a winner, you also should, since multitabling will probably make you a loser. Once you are a decent winner, multi tabling becomes crucial if you are interested in making more money.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-16-2005, 12:17 PM
jba jba is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 672
Default Re: Multitabling....necessary?

why would it be necessary? play one table and add as you get comfortable.

FWIW against non-challenging players I can play about eight tables of full ring or five tables of SH. so your ratio sounds about right.


edit: also consider your sample size. I will have 1k stretches where nary a difficult decision is presented, and sometimes I'll have ten really really tough hands in a row.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12-16-2005, 12:21 PM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Multitabling....necessary?

I'm probably worrying for the sake of worrying, it just seems like everybody except me is playing at LEAST 2 tables.

I guess just like full ring, short handed will eventually get easier to me, and I'll slowly be able to add.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 12-16-2005, 12:24 PM
Spicymoose Spicymoose is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 146
Default Re: Multitabling....necessary?

[ QUOTE ]
I guess just like full ring, short handed will eventually get easier to me, and I'll slowly be able to add.

[/ QUOTE ]

Yup. As you get better, more decisions become automatic, and you will be spend more of your time focusing on the harder decisions. Multi-tabling also requires practice though, so maybe you should occasionally drop down in limits, and increase your table count if you want to increase your multi-tabling abilities quicker.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 12-16-2005, 12:25 PM
Aaron W. Aaron W. is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 87
Default Re: Multitabling....necessary?

[ QUOTE ]
In a single question, did most of you single table until you were comfortable, or did you make yourself play more than one table?

[/ QUOTE ]

The answer to your question lies in what your priorities are for playing poker. Are you trying to make lots of money? Learn to multi-table. Are you playing for fun? Do whatever makes you happy.

I single table most of the time because it makes the game more interesting. I'm not an action junkie who gets bored if I don't have a decision to make every 3-5 seconds.

The only time I multitable is to clear a bonus.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 12-16-2005, 12:26 PM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Multitabling....necessary?

seriously, I started playing one table (short and long), added a table, added 2 tables, added 4 tables.

I know play between 2 and 12 tables of shorthand at once.

The action is fast but at 1/2 the decisions are often very easy, especially with PokerAceHUD.

True
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 12-16-2005, 12:36 PM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Multitabling....necessary?

My priorities in poker are not to make a lot of money, but to ease my way up to $5/$10 within the year. Obviously, the quicker the better, but I'm in no real hurry.

I'm at $1/$2 now, with some fairly lucky forays into $2/$4. A couple more bonuses and another month of decent cards, and I should be fully rolled for 2/4.

Anyway, thanks for the answers. Guess I'm trying to do too much too soon.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 12-16-2005, 12:38 PM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Multitabling....necessary?

Just wanted to add that this community is fantastic, and I truly appreciate all the help I've already received. Hopefully I'll be able to help out as well as I've been helped at some point.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 12-16-2005, 12:48 PM
Spicymoose Spicymoose is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 146
Default Re: Multitabling....necessary?

[ QUOTE ]
Just wanted to add that this community is fantastic, and I truly appreciate all the help I've already received. Hopefully I'll be able to help out as well as I've been helped at some point.

[/ QUOTE ]

Sounds like you have a good attitude. The more you put in, the more you will get out. You will easily be able to reach your goals of 5/10 in no time if you put in the effort.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:47 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.