Suggesting that someone is gay??? - Page 3

#21 10-08-2005, 03:03 PM

Being called a [censored] is insulting because it suggests you are willing to take a dick in the ass, like a subservient greek slave boy or a prison punk bitch. Not cool to be equated with those types.

Matty · #22 10-08-2005, 04:03 PM

[ QUOTE ]
Because homos are not normal.

[/ QUOTE ]Bullshit. Unless you mean they're abnormal in the same way left-handed people are abnormal.

Aytumious · #23 10-08-2005, 04:06 PM

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Because homos are not normal.

[/ QUOTE ]Bullshit. Unless you mean they're abnormal in the same way left-handed people are abnormal.

[/ QUOTE ]

I hate [censored] lefties. And people with hazel eyes. And red heads. And especially albinos. Can't trust em.

DyessMan89 · #24 10-08-2005, 05:41 PM

[ QUOTE ]
Because homos are not normal.

[/ QUOTE ]

nh

Matty · #25 10-08-2005, 06:45 PM

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Because homos are not normal.

[/ QUOTE ]

nh

[/ QUOTE ]You are so left-handed.

Oh wait, that line of reasoning doesn't work anymore. Maybe, just maybe, it's something else. Maybe past societies like the Greeks who were open to homosexuality also blow a hole in that hypothesis.

Bez · #26 10-08-2005, 07:53 PM

I am a left handed red head with hazel eyes. Let's take it outside.

PS You are gay.

Peter666 · #27 10-08-2005, 08:02 PM

Some Greeks practiced homosexuality, but the great thinkers like Aristotle condemned it. I am sure some practiced beastiality as well.

The point is, stuff is suppose to come out of the rectum, not be put inside it. Anybody who enjoys to be copulated through their rectum is an abnormal freak.

Dan Mezick · #28 10-08-2005, 11:44 PM

Ask Carl Rove, he might know the answer.

Matty · #29 10-09-2005, 05:12 AM

[ QUOTE ]
Some Greeks practiced homosexuality, but the great thinkers like Aristotle condemned it. I am sure some practiced beastiality as well.

[/ QUOTE ]This does not in any way refute my point. A society once largely accepted what you deem an "abnormal" behavior- and some societies today also do. So clearly there has to be something else to explain why homosexuality is an insult in this particular society. The hypothesis that "abnormal" things (however you define that) are unaccepted in society is false.[ QUOTE ]
The point is, stuff is suppose to come out of the rectum, not be put inside it. Anybody who enjoys to be copulated through their rectum is an abnormal freak.

[/ QUOTE ]Uh, you could say the same thing about oral sex.

Acceptance of bisexual women also proves the "abnormal" hypothesis incorrect as well.

I say anyone who doesn't enjoy oral sex is an abnormal freak. What do you think of that?

Peter666 · #30 10-09-2005, 12:58 PM

Abnormal by "society" standards and natural standards are two different things. Society can condone all sorts of lewd behaviour that are freakishly abnormal.

Before you tried to say that a person with different coloured hair or being left handed is a freak. Naturally speaking this is not so, although a perverse society may consider it so. One must make the distinction between what is natural and unnatural.

Regarding oral sex, yeah, I would enjoy it...from a good looking woman! But oral sex with a woman does not negate the natural effect because there is always the possibility of sticking it in her reproductive organs to finish off. This cannot be done with a person of the same sex. C'est ne possible de. So naturally speaking, lesbians and gay men are still freaks of nature. It is impossible for them to reproduce while together.