|
View Poll Results: 1 | |||
I think doyle amassed millions through honest and superior play. | 87 | 100.00% | |
Voters: 87. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
At What liimit does Mulitabling ABC poker no longer be enough to win?
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: At What liimit does Mulitabling ABC poker no longer be enough to win?
10/20 SH is where I've needed to become a bit creative. It is still pretty easy though.
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: At What liimit does Mulitabling ABC poker no longer be enough to w
I don't play SH, but I think that all of the full ring games mentioned are beatable with ABC poker. With 10/20 (PP) probably being the most difficult.
Though from what i've played of SH, I agree with 10/20 being a landmark. For what it's worth, I multitable 5/10 full. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: At What liimit does Mulitabling ABC poker no longer be enough to win?
If we by ABC mean that we vary our plays based on player type, but always make the same play in the same situation against the same individual player I don't think any of those limits are unbeatable.
Because frankly all major villains will be multitabling too. |
|
|