#1
|
|||
|
|||
Fascinating RGP Post
http://www.recpoker.com/article.php?gID=1&ID=253170
Never thought of tournaments in quite this fashion. Sounds like it would be fun to give it a try. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Can we nominate RGP posts for post of the year?
This is tremendous. Really interesting reading.
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Fascinating RGP Post
A similar thing was posted on RGP a coupla years ago I think. It makes more sense to me than playing some of the tourns really. But it is kind of nuts, particularly when you fiond yerself saying "4000 isn't much for a 400-800 game. Really? [img]/images/graemlins/tongue.gif[/img]
But Bill, the way you stack chips when yer hot you might want to give it a try. You can play more than one game, so if you got to a place w/ a lot of games and a big top section you could really push a rush when you are playing good. I want to see you in a 1500-3000 game jamming your favorite hand and seeing how they react. [img]/images/graemlins/laugh.gif[/img] |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Can we nominate RGP posts for post of the year?
Guys,
Hate to bother you but what is ABC when referring to razz? The RGP post mentions that when discussing the big game. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Can we nominate RGP posts for post of the year?
A-2-3
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Fascinating RGP Post
I've thought about trying this many times. I've thought about many ways of doing this, but I think I like this guys idea the best. I am definitely gonna give this a try sometime soon. Unfortunately or maybe fortunately my local card room doesn't spread that big of limits, 2-4 to 30-60. But what the hell, the most I would lose on this experiment is $100.
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Fascinating RGP Post
Well written post, thanks for digging it up at RGP
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Fascinating RGP Post
wow. cool post. wish we had that big of a spread in limits here.
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Fascinating RGP Post
i remember reading that before. while it's entertaining, i think it's a fabrication. the key is the very start where he plays 1-2 and claims to win $50. if you seen the rake in that game you would realise that that's impossible.
when i was playing at commerce a lot a friend and i used to ponder the idea of running a parlay from 15-30 up to 80-160 (or 200-400 if they were spreading it). never seemed to get around to it though; taking a $500 buy in and running it into 2 grand playing 15 or 20 always seemed like parlay enough for one night. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Fascinating RGP Post
That is a cool post, true or not.
I remember reading a post on a UK forum from a well-known player that there was a player who used to specialise in exactly that kind of thing at the Victoria Casino in London - start in the £50 buy-in Pot limit game, and keep playing and moving up till he was in the big game or bust. It must be a lot easier/faster to do in PL than limit, although also a lot easier too to lose everything very quickly. |
|
|