Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > General Poker Discussion > Texas Hold'em

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-20-2005, 05:49 PM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Quotation from \"Small Stakes Hold\'em\"

I just read "Small Stakes Hold'em" for the second time and I wonder about what is said in the beginning under "Why This Book..." Sklansky suggests "Making well over $50.000 per year playing $3-6 hold'em is now no big deal." This could be done "because you can play two or three games at once". Is this expactation realistic? It seems a little high to me. Is there any 2+2er who could confirm it's possible based on experience? Anyone else with ideas and thoughts about it please post your views about expectations at low limit hold'em.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-20-2005, 05:53 PM
damaniac damaniac is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Not stopping running QB\'s
Posts: 60
Default Re: Quotation from \"Small Stakes Hold\'em\"

They are presumably referring to the internet, where many 2+2ers play 4-8 tables, some play 10. In fact, I assume that virtually all online players at 2+2 probably play more than 1 table at a time.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-20-2005, 06:01 PM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Quotation from \"Small Stakes Hold\'em\"

$50,000 is an average of $137 per day . . . say you play for 8 hours (including weekends) . . . then you need to make $17.13 per hour (roughly 3bb per hour) . . . if you play 3 tables that is 1bb per hour, per table . . . Play 6 tables and you only need to work for 4 hours instead of 8 . . . etc.

1bb/hr (per table) is a very reasonable win rate for 3/6, you just need to play sightly better than the average Joe at your table =)
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12-20-2005, 06:03 PM
SackUp SackUp is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 4
Default Re: Quotation from \"Small Stakes Hold\'em\"

This post probably should go in the general forum as this is for strategy. But, to answer your question, I would say that this is definitely possible. You can make half of that in RB and bonuses alone. He is definitely talking about someone playing fairly full-time and not part time, but highly doable.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 12-20-2005, 06:03 PM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Quotation from \"Small Stakes Hold\'em\"

Yes I'm aware of that, maybe I wasn't clear about my question. May I put it this way: Is it realististic to win more than 50 gran a year on 3/6 (or 5/10) playing 3 tables only following the guidelines of "Small Stakes Hold'em" (and do it well of course) without any extraordinary "expert" skills?
I believe that is what Sklansky says or am I misinterpreting him?
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 12-20-2005, 06:05 PM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Quotation from \"Small Stakes Hold\'em\"

[ QUOTE ]
Yes I'm aware of that, maybe I wasn't clear about my question. May I put it this way: Is it realististic to win more than 50 gran a year on 3/6 (or 5/10) playing 3 tables only following the guidelines of "Small Stakes Hold'em" (and do it well of course) without any extraordinary "expert" skills?
I believe that is what Sklansky says or am I misinterpreting him?

[/ QUOTE ]

I personally would rather kill myself than play 4 table SSHE as a full time job, but yes it is very doable, especially with bonuses.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 12-20-2005, 06:05 PM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Quotation from \"Small Stakes Hold\'em\"

[ QUOTE ]
Yes I'm aware of that, maybe I wasn't clear about my question. May I put it this way: Is it realististic to win more than 50 gran a year on 3/6 (or 5/10) playing 3 tables only following the guidelines of "Small Stakes Hold'em" (and do it well of course) without any extraordinary "expert" skills?
I believe that is what Sklansky says or am I misinterpreting him?

[/ QUOTE ]

In order to eke out the maximum edge, you will have to deviate from the book's advice at times. The key is to know when those times are.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 12-20-2005, 06:23 PM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Quotation from \"Small Stakes Hold\'em\"

OK, how high is the SSH strategy working alone (talking online poker)? 5/10?
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 12-20-2005, 08:05 PM
livinitup0 livinitup0 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 18
Default Re: Quotation from \"Small Stakes Hold\'em\"

[ QUOTE ]
I just read "Small Stakes Hold'em" for the second time and I wonder about what is said in the beginning under "Why This Book..." Sklansky suggests "Making well over $50.000 per year playing $3-6 hold'em is now no big deal." This could be done "because you can play two or three games at once". Is this expactation realistic? It seems a little high to me. Is there any 2+2er who could confirm it's possible based on experience? Anyone else with ideas and thoughts about it please post your views about expectations at low limit hold'em.

[/ QUOTE ]

I didnt even read most of this or the responses. This was talked about to DEATH in the magazine forum. It would be a waste of time to discuss it again.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 12-20-2005, 08:21 PM
bobbyi bobbyi is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 14
Default Re: Quotation from \"Small Stakes Hold\'em\"

If you liked that quote, you'll love the the editor's note to last month's 2+2 magazine where Ed Miller says "Now it seems like maybe that number should be more like $200,000."
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:04 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, vBulletin Solutions Inc.