Two Plus Two Older Archives Question about \$2/4 on Stars
 FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

#11
12-29-2005, 07:04 PM
 Recliner Member Join Date: May 2004 Posts: 38
Re: Question about \$2/4 on Stars

[ QUOTE ]

Hijack Alert: Anyone have numbers on 1/2 NL?? [img]/images/graemlins/smirk.gif[/img]

[/ QUOTE ]

I've got 38% for 1/2 NL over 4,300 hands and 23% for .5/1 NL over 11,200 hands.

You can get these numbers by setting up poker tracker to only show stats for Poker Stars and only at the limit you want and then go into the 'Game Notes' tab, set 'Only show hands with at least \$1 rake' and then 'Get All'.

To continue the hijack I'd like it if everyone could give info on whatever limits they play so I can add the information into my calculator so people have an easier time figuring out how many VPPs and FPPs they are going to generate.
#12
12-30-2005, 03:28 AM
 MrMon Senior Member Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: St. Louis, MO Posts: 135
Re: Question about \$2/4 on Stars

\$2/\$4 6 max update - 44.6% raked, 39 raked hands/table/hr. Finally found some looser tables, and were they juicy! These are not high-speed tables, however.
#13
12-30-2005, 03:35 AM
 waffle Senior Member Join Date: Jul 2004 Location: Dallas - 2/4 and 3/6 Posts: 117
Re: Question about \$2/4 on Stars

[ QUOTE ]
\$2/\$4 6 max update - 44.6% raked, 39 raked hands/table/hr. Finally found some looser tables, and were they juicy! These are not high-speed tables, however.

[/ QUOTE ]

almost every single table is juicy.
#14
12-30-2005, 04:26 AM
 Guest Posts: n/a
Re: Question about \$2/4 on Stars

[ QUOTE ]
I'm guessing the percentage of raked-hands on Stars low-limit tables will go down beginning on Jan 1.

[/ QUOTE ]

Maybe I'm missing something, but why is that?
#15
12-30-2005, 04:48 AM
 waffle Senior Member Join Date: Jul 2004 Location: Dallas - 2/4 and 3/6 Posts: 117
Re: Question about \$2/4 on Stars

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I'm guessing the percentage of raked-hands on Stars low-limit tables will go down beginning on Jan 1.

[/ QUOTE ]

Maybe I'm missing something, but why is that?

[/ QUOTE ]

vip club goes live, more tight players start playing on stars.
#16
12-30-2005, 04:58 AM
 Sniper Senior Member Join Date: Jun 2005 Posts: 704
Re: Question about \$2/4 on Stars

[ QUOTE ]
vip club goes live, more tight players start playing on stars.

[/ QUOTE ]

Double FPP on Stars right now... if they aren't there now taking advantage of that, to get a head start on the juicy VIP prizes.. they aren't gonna be there on Jan 1 [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]
#17
12-30-2005, 05:36 AM
 Losing all Senior Member Join Date: Sep 2003 Location: South of Heaven Posts: 577
Re: Question about \$2/4 on Stars

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
vip club goes live, more tight players start playing on stars.

[/ QUOTE ]

Double FPP on Stars right now... if they aren't there now taking advantage of that, to get a head start on the juicy VIP prizes.. they aren't gonna be there on Jan 1 [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]

[/ QUOTE ]

I dunno, the double seems good, but after a week or so I'll never get under double again.
#18
12-30-2005, 07:31 AM
 MicroBob Senior Member Join Date: Sep 2003 Location: memphis Posts: 1,245
Re: Question about \$2/4 on Stars

exactly...the double-points does practically nothing for me and I haven't been playing there at all.

However, maybe it does do something for some people.

but it feels like every 2+2'er and their brother will be heading over to stars beginning Jan 1. Hopefully enough fish get dragged along.

Will be interesting to see how much more ring-game action they get the first week of Jan compared with what they normally get.
#19
12-30-2005, 08:43 AM
 Rootabager Member Join Date: May 2005 Location: Lexington KY Posts: 59
Re: Question about \$2/4 on Stars

Why would that many 22'ers be going there if they still cant get rakeback? I will play there occasionally but the VIP still isnt rakeback.
#20
12-30-2005, 09:49 AM
 MicroBob Senior Member Join Date: Sep 2003 Location: memphis Posts: 1,245
Re: Question about \$2/4 on Stars

it is roughly the same as rakeback in the minds of many 2+2'ers.

It's obvious from the discussion in various threads that lots of 2+2'ers are interested in this program and will be trying it out.

 Thread Tools Display Modes Linear Mode

 Posting Rules You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is Off Forum Rules
 Forum Jump User Control Panel Private Messages Subscriptions Who's Online Search Forums Forums Home Two Plus Two     Two Plus Two Internet Magazine     About the Forums     MOD DISCUSSION     ISOP General Poker Discussion     Texas Hold'em     Beginners Questions     Books and Publications     Televised Poker     News, Views, and Gossip     Brick and Mortar     Home Poker     Poker Beats, Brags, and Variance     Poker Theory Limit Texas Hold'em     Mid- and High-Stakes Hold'em     Medium Stakes Hold'em     Small Stakes Hold'em     Micro-Limits     Mid-High Stakes Shorthanded     Small Stakes Shorthanded PL/NL Texas Hold'em     Mid-, High-Stakes Pot- and No-Limit Hold'em     Medium-Stakes Pot-, No-Limit Hold'em     Small Stakes Pot-, No-Limit Hold'em Tournament Poker     Multi-table Tournaments     One-table Tournaments Other Poker     Omaha/8     Omaha High     Stud     Other Poker Games General Gambling     Probability     Psychology     Sports Betting     Other Gambling Games     Rake Back     Computer Technical Help Internet Gambling     Internet Gambling     Internet Bonuses     Software 2+2 Communities     Other Other Topics Other Topics     Sporting Events     Politics     Science, Math, and Philosophy     The Stock Market

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:58 AM.