Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Limit Texas Hold'em > Small Stakes Hold'em
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 11-12-2005, 04:42 PM
Sarge85 Sarge85 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 604
Default Re: 89o

[ QUOTE ]
The flop 3-bet is to clean up some outs correct?



[/ QUOTE ]

The three bet is much more for value, than any outs were going to clean up with a check raise, after the players behind have already put money in.

Sarge[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 11-12-2005, 04:53 PM
SenecaJim SenecaJim is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 3
Default Re: 89o

Definitely. I think this one is close 'cause can't count 5 [img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] or T [img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] as full outs. But, still +ev with 3 others in.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 11-12-2005, 05:04 PM
QTip QTip is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 31
Default Re: 89o

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I have a new db going on here, and just started at this table, so I don't know much of anyone here. Except I've seen the co show a lot of aggression in a few hands.

Party Poker 2/4 Hold'em (8 handed) FTR converter on zerodivide.cx

Preflop: Hero is SB with 8[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img], 9[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img].
UTG calls, UTG+1 calls, <font color="#666666">2 folds</font>, CO calls, Button calls, Hero completes, BB checks.

Flop: (6 SB) 6[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img], 2[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img], 7[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(6 players)</font>
<font color="#CC3333">Hero bets</font>, BB folds, UTG calls, UTG+1 calls, <font color="#CC3333">CO raises</font>, Button folds, <font color="#CC3333">Hero 3-bets</font>

[/ QUOTE ]

It's not terrible by any means, but I'm less inclined to do this on a flush board. I'd rather check-call. If it was rainbow, I'd do it all the time.


Sarge[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img]

[/ QUOTE ]

Maybe I'm underestimating the impact of the 2 suits out there.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 11-12-2005, 05:11 PM
Sarge85 Sarge85 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 604
Default Re: 89o

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I have a new db going on here, and just started at this table, so I don't know much of anyone here. Except I've seen the co show a lot of aggression in a few hands.

Party Poker 2/4 Hold'em (8 handed) FTR converter on zerodivide.cx

Preflop: Hero is SB with 8[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img], 9[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img].
UTG calls, UTG+1 calls, <font color="#666666">2 folds</font>, CO calls, Button calls, Hero completes, BB checks.

Flop: (6 SB) 6[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img], 2[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img], 7[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(6 players)</font>
<font color="#CC3333">Hero bets</font>, BB folds, UTG calls, UTG+1 calls, <font color="#CC3333">CO raises</font>, Button folds, <font color="#CC3333">Hero 3-bets</font>

[/ QUOTE ]

It's not terrible by any means, but I'm less inclined to do this on a flush board. I'd rather check-call. If it was rainbow, I'd do it all the time.


Sarge[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img]

[/ QUOTE ]

Maybe I'm underestimating the impact of the 2 suits out there.

[/ QUOTE ]

yes and no.

It's similar to waiting for a safe turn card to raise thinking. But with a draw....

Sarge[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 11-12-2005, 05:16 PM
QTip QTip is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 31
Default Re: 89o

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I have a new db going on here, and just started at this table, so I don't know much of anyone here. Except I've seen the co show a lot of aggression in a few hands.

Party Poker 2/4 Hold'em (8 handed) FTR converter on zerodivide.cx

Preflop: Hero is SB with 8[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img], 9[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img].
UTG calls, UTG+1 calls, <font color="#666666">2 folds</font>, CO calls, Button calls, Hero completes, BB checks.

Flop: (6 SB) 6[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img], 2[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img], 7[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(6 players)</font>
<font color="#CC3333">Hero bets</font>, BB folds, UTG calls, UTG+1 calls, <font color="#CC3333">CO raises</font>, Button folds, <font color="#CC3333">Hero 3-bets</font>

[/ QUOTE ]

It's not terrible by any means, but I'm less inclined to do this on a flush board. I'd rather check-call. If it was rainbow, I'd do it all the time.


Sarge[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img]

[/ QUOTE ]

Maybe I'm underestimating the impact of the 2 suits out there.

[/ QUOTE ]

yes and no.

It's similar to waiting for a safe turn card to raise thinking. But with a draw....

Sarge[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img]

[/ QUOTE ]

A friend of mine just point out that the 2 suits not only make it awkward for me when a dimaond falls on the turn, but also makes it more likely that I'll get callers behind me. I'm liking the 3 bet less and less with the 2 flush cards out there. However, I do still like the initial flop bet. Maybe that will change in 2 more posts as well [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 11-12-2005, 07:52 PM
Carmine Carmine is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 36
Default Re: 89o

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
The flop 3-bet is to clean up some outs correct?



[/ QUOTE ]



The three bet is much more for value, than any outs were going to clean up with a check raise, after the players behind have already put money in.

Sarge[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img]

[/ QUOTE ]

I play much more 3/6 than 2/4 and realize 2/4 is much looser, but is a 3-bet really for value when we face the ep players with two more cold? Now if they are two big fish that's a different story.

The flop lead I like "in this case" because you list the CO as the more aggressive player so we are looking to trap players which worked. However I have done this often in the past and when it's the BB or EP player raising it really sucks to be isolated with a draw so it's always a risky proposition. Generally if the table is pasive I lead but with aggresive tags that will raise in big pots "to clean up outs" etc. I tend to check and hope.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 11-12-2005, 08:50 PM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: 89o

[ QUOTE ]

There are boards on which checking a FF or an OESD is a good idea. This isn't one of them.

[/ QUOTE ]

I'm interested in your view here.

I expected the flop bet to be because of CO, not so much the board.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 11-12-2005, 09:04 PM
QTip QTip is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 31
Default Re: 89o

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]

There are boards on which checking a FF or an OESD is a good idea. This isn't one of them.

[/ QUOTE ]

I'm interested in your view here.

I expected the flop bet to be because of CO, not so much the board.

[/ QUOTE ]

Both. We had a thread on this about 2 months ago. Certain flops are more likely to be bet by someone else or raised to your left.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:23 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.