#1
|
|||
|
|||
$215 SNG level 3 hand
No relevant reads...
Comments? My results and thoughts later... ***** Hand History for Game 2203388100 ***** 50/100 TourneyTexasHTGameTable (NL) (Tournament 13073260) - Mon Jun 13 22:22:46 EDT 2005 Table Table 11131 (Real Money) -- Seat 5 is the button Total number of players : 10 Seat 1: mush00 (795) Seat 2: Mooon33 (570) Seat 3: Jints91 (840) Seat 4: ineimesis (652) Seat 5: STOP_Drawing (1540) Seat 6: Maxrob (755) Seat 7: DarrenX (955) Seat 8: projecteros (1163) Seat 9: Thomas_007 (1835) Seat 10: Munchausen1 (895) Maxrob posts small blind (25) DarrenX posts big blind (50) ** Dealing down cards ** Dealt to DarrenX [ 9d, 7d ] projecteros calls (50) Thomas_007 folds. Munchausen1 folds. mush00 calls (50) Mooon33 folds. Jints91 folds. ineimesis folds. STOP_Drawing folds. Maxrob calls (25) DarrenX checks. ** Dealing Flop ** : [ 6s, Td, 6d ] Maxrob checks. DarrenX checks. projecteros checks. mush00 bets (200) Maxrob folds. DarrenX calls (200) projecteros folds. ** Dealing Turn ** : [ Ac ] DarrenX bets (705) DarrenX is all-In. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: $215 SNG level 3 hand
Who's up for splitting the SNG forum into different levels? I would never make this play even at the $55s, but it may work at the higher levels.
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: $215 SNG level 3 hand
I'm with you, but then again I'm down at the 11s and 22s, so my advice is probably useless on this. As far as the actual hand, I can't see myself making the move either. I've missed the turn, probably a check fold, unless he bets small or checks fearing the 6 (which I doubt).
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: $215 SNG level 3 hand
Well, considering villain limped from EP on level 3 with only t795, I don't really think you can put him on a 6 or an ace. The only other possible hand I could see him having is a pair of tens. Some people MIGHT limp with this in this spot (not me). Possibly 77-99.
So I think that given that you could have had anything playing from the blinds, my guess is that this play will work quite often. Especially since I view his flop bet as a sign of weakness really. What happened? |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: $215 SNG level 3 hand
[ QUOTE ]
No relevant reads... Comments? My results and thoughts later... [/ QUOTE ] I don't like it. Agree with the check, but I prefer push or fold when it's back to me. By getting tricky you give him a free card to hit his overs on the turn, in which case you may now get a call. If he has a PP<TT he folds the flop if you CR him all-in and he's going nowhere if he has a 6 either way. So I'm not sure what extra FE you get by the SNG. Anyhow, I've probably missed something so looking forward to your explanation.... |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: $215 SNG level 3 hand
Again...are you trying to lose? I see no reason to get involved with a crappy flush draw in the early levels when a pair is already on the board.
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: $215 SNG level 3 hand
I assume you were planning on pushing any turn when you called the flop. Is that true?
I don't think it is good, but not terrible. The problem is the Villian's stack is too short. His bet on the turn was either a 6, a Ten, a Draw, Overs (an Ace?), or a complete bluff. Considering his stack and what is in the pot he will call with most of those. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: $215 SNG level 3 hand
I don't mean to be saying that even he had a bigger stack you should necessarily make this bluff. You gotta have good timing for bluffs and it's hard to endorse one out of context.
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: $215 SNG level 3 hand
[ QUOTE ]
Again...are you trying to lose? I see no reason to get involved with a crappy flush draw in the early levels when a pair is already on the board. [/ QUOTE ] You know he has an inside str8 draw too right? And that big flop bet is not coming from a FH or trips.... Your bluff will be called by A-10, but K-10, Q-10 and J-10 should fold. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Re: $215 SNG level 3 hand
215 is my regular game and I'd never make this call. In fact, I wouldn't make this call at any limit.
|
|
|