Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > General Poker Discussion > Televised Poker
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 02-14-2005, 06:05 PM
shummie shummie is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 0
Default Re: Not that I don\'t agree...

Varkoni isn't given the same attention because you can't figure out how to spell his name. No one can. Moneymaker on the other hand is very easy to spell and is just too great of a pun for the newspapers and other media outlets to let slip by.

I bet the online satelite part of it played a role too.

I think poker would have gotten as big as it is now, but it may have taken an extra year if not for Moneymaker's win.

- Jason
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 02-14-2005, 06:21 PM
ClaytonN ClaytonN is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 1,630
Default Re: Not that I don\'t agree...

I consider myself a SportsCenter junkie, and I don't remember watching any coverage with Varkoyni.

It's Moneymaker's victory for the obvious reasons:
1) He's an American named Moneymaker
2) The hole card cams introduced on ESPN. They give the added feeling of "armchair quarterback" to the viewer.
3) That huge bluff he pulled on Farha.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:36 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.